What are the sources of Charlie Kirk's claims about trans people and violence?

Checked on September 23, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Was this fact-check helpful?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided do not directly answer the question about the sources of Charlie Kirk's claims regarding trans people and violence [1] [2] [3] [4]. However, some sources suggest that Charlie Kirk made claims about trans people and violence, but the sources of these claims are not provided [5] [6]. According to [5], the Heritage Foundation, associated with Kirk, has made false claims about violence from trans people and allies. Additionally, [6] mentions that Kirk had attacked the trans community online and on his podcast, and that the alleged shooter was motivated by Kirk's hate speech against the trans community [6]. It is also worth noting that the number of mass shootings committed by transgender individuals is relatively small, less than 0.1% of mass shootings in the last 12 years, according to the Gun Violence Archive [7].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some key context is missing from the original statement, including the fact that Charlie Kirk was a conservative commentator who opposed transgender rights [4]. Alternative viewpoints, such as the fact that Congressman Troy Carter made a statement on a resolution regarding Charlie Kirk's murder, and Kirk's opposition to healthcare for transgender people, are also not considered [2]. Furthermore, the problem of misinformation and scapegoating of marginalized communities, particularly trans people, in the wake of violent incidents is highlighted in [8]. The lack of information about the sources of Charlie Kirk's claims regarding trans people and violence is a significant gap in the analysis [1] [2] [3] [4]. Different sources provide different perspectives on the issue, with some focusing on the reactions to Kirk's death and the debate over his legacy [3], while others discuss the implications of his killing for American politics [4].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be based on incomplete or inaccurate information, as the sources of Charlie Kirk's claims regarding trans people and violence are not provided [1] [2] [3] [4]. The Heritage Foundation, associated with Kirk, has made false claims about violence from trans people and allies, which may have contributed to the misinformation [5]. Additionally, the alleged shooter's motivation, as reported in [6], may have been influenced by Kirk's hate speech against the trans community. The fact that some media outlets incorrectly linked the suspected shooter to the transgender community, as reported in [8], highlights the potential for misinformation and bias in the original statement. The beneficiaries of this framing may include those who seek to promote a particular political agenda or ideology, such as the Heritage Foundation [5], while the trans community and other marginalized groups may be harmed by the misinformation and scapegoating [8].

Want to dive deeper?
What studies have investigated the relationship between being trans and violent behavior?
How have LGBTQ+ organizations responded to Charlie Kirk's claims about trans people?
What are the most commonly cited sources on trans violence, and are they peer-reviewed?
Has Charlie Kirk provided any evidence to support his claims about trans people and violence?
How do Charlie Kirk's claims compare to the findings of the FBI's hate crime statistics on trans individuals?