Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Did Charlie Kirk say that we should deal with transgender people the way we did in the 1950s and 60s?

Checked on September 17, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement in question is whether Charlie Kirk said that we should deal with transgender people the way we did in the 1950s and 60s. According to source [1], Charlie Kirk did make a statement that can be interpreted as a nod to violent acts against marginalized groups, saying "Someone should’ve just took care of it the way we used to take care of things in the 1950s and 60s" when referring to trans people [1]. Source [2] also mentions a similar statement, presenting it as an example of Kirk's hateful rhetoric towards trans people [2]. However, not all sources confirm this statement, with source [3] only mentioning Kirk's polarizing views on gay and transgender rights without providing direct evidence of the specific statement [3]. Other sources, such as [3], [4], and [5], do not mention the statement at all, instead focusing on Kirk's opposition to same-sex marriage and gender-affirming care, as well as his traditional Christian conservative stance [3] [4] [5]. Sources [3], [7], and [6] also do not mention the statement, with [6] mentioning Kirk's controversial views on transgender issues, including comparing them to a 'throbbing middle finger to God' [6].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key missing context in the original statement is the lack of direct quotes from Charlie Kirk in many of the sources, making it difficult to confirm the exact wording of his statement [3] [4] [5] [7]. Additionally, alternative viewpoints on Kirk's statement are not fully explored, with some sources presenting his views as hateful rhetoric [1] [2], while others focus on his conservative stance without mentioning the specific statement [3] [4] [5]. Sources [1] and [2] provide evidence of Kirk's statement, but sources [3], [4], and [5] do not, highlighting the need for further context and clarification [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. The historical context of the 1950s and 60s is also not fully explored, with no sources providing a detailed analysis of how transgender people were treated during this time period [3] [1] [2] [4] [5] [7] [6].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading due to the lack of confirmation from all sources, with some sources not mentioning the statement at all [3] [4] [5] [7]. Sources [1] and [2] provide evidence of Kirk's statement, but other sources do not, which may indicate bias in the presentation of information [1] [2]. The statement may also be taken out of context, with no sources providing a detailed analysis of Kirk's views on transgender issues beyond the specific statement [3] [1] [2] [4] [5] [7] [6]. Charlie Kirk's supporters may benefit from downplaying or denying the statement, while LGBTQ+ advocacy groups may benefit from highlighting the statement as an example of Kirk's hateful rhetoric [1] [2]. The media may also play a role in shaping the narrative, with some sources presenting Kirk's views as conservative and traditional, while others present them as hateful and discriminatory [3] [4] [5] [7] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What were the social and medical treatments for transgender people in the 1950s and 60s?
Has Charlie Kirk made any other public statements about LGBTQ+ issues?
How do Charlie Kirk's views on transgender issues align with or differ from other conservative figures?
What are the potential consequences of applying 1950s and 60s treatment approaches to modern transgender issues?
How have LGBTQ+ advocacy groups responded to Charlie Kirk's comments on transgender issues?