Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Now they're shooting US citizens!
Executive Summary
The statement “Now they're shooting US citizens!” conflates isolated, well-documented law-enforcement and federal-agent shootings with a claim of a broad or new pattern; multiple recent incidents confirm that U.S. citizens have been shot by federal agents and local police, but the scope, justification, and context vary by case and remain contested. A close look at three recent high-profile incidents and national data shows verified shootings, fierce disputes over circumstances, and unresolved questions about accountability and evidence handling [1] [2] [3].
1. How the claim is being framed and what the sources actually say — extracting the competing claims
The core public claim asserts that federal agents are shooting U.S. citizens, and the provided materials document at least two separate, recent incidents involving federal agents and U.S. citizens: an October 30 shooting in Ontario, California, where lawyers say Carlos Jimenez was shot while warning agents about children at a bus stop and federal officials say he tried to run them over; and an October 4 Chicago case where Border Patrol Agent Charles Exum shot Marimar Martinez after a collision and claimed self-defense [1] [4] [2]. Each source records a sharp factual dispute over whether the shootings were justified; lawyers and family members describe unprovoked or unnecessary force, while federal agencies assert defensive action. These sources also show follow-up actions: legal claims, federal indictments, congressional demands for transparency, and public protests [1] [2] [4].
2. Independent corroboration and what recent reporting confirms — three high-profile incidents
Contemporary news reporting confirms the Ontario and Chicago episodes as separate, scrutinized events: local and national outlets report the Ontario shooting of Carlos Jimenez with attorneys contesting the ICE account and Congresswoman Norma Torres demanding documents and body‑camera footage [1] [4]. The Chicago shooting of Marimar Martinez by a Border Patrol agent produced indictments and reporting on the agent’s texts and the chain-of-custody controversy for his vehicle [2]. These accounts are corroborated by updated reporting dated in early November 2025 and include official statements, legal filings, and investigative steps, demonstrating that these are not rumors but active legal and oversight matters currently under review [1] [2] [4].
3. Bigger picture: are these isolated incidents or part of a pattern? — national data and historical context
National datasets and watchdog compilations show law enforcement kills hundreds annually, meaning police and federal agents do shoot U.S. citizens each year; Mapping Police Violence and federal/local tallies document hundreds of officer-involved shootings in 2025 and longstanding racial disparities in who is killed [3] [5] [6]. These statistics place the recent federal-agent incidents in a broader pattern of lethal force by authorities, but they do not by themselves prove a coordinated surge by federal immigration agents specifically targeting citizens. Instead, the data point to persistent systemic issues — disparities, frequency, and recurring disputes over accountability — that make isolated episodes part of a larger governance concern [3] [5].
4. Where facts diverge and why evidence handling matters — chain-of-custody, body cams, and competing narratives
The published analyses show consistent areas of conflict: eyewitness and attorney accounts vs. federal claims, inconsistent testimonies, and contested evidence procedures. In Chicago, reporting highlights that the agent’s vehicle was repaired and returned before defense inspection, and his statements about repairs conflicted with an FBI interview; critics flagged possible evidence tampering and rushed releases [2]. In Ontario, lawmakers demanded body-camera footage and investigative transparency to reconcile claims that a man was shot while warning about children versus assertions he tried to ram officers [1] [4]. These procedural gaps make reliable adjudication difficult and fuel public distrust, underscoring the centrality of preserved evidence and independent oversight in resolving what actually occurred [2] [4].
5. Bottom line, unanswered questions, and what to watch next — accountability and oversight
Verified reporting establishes that U.S. citizens were shot in at least several recent, high-profile encounters with federal agents and police, but the label “Now they’re shooting US citizens!” oversimplifies complex, contested events. Key unresolved facts include whether footage and full investigative records exist and will be released, whether chain-of-custody and evidence-handling meet prosecutorial standards, and whether administrative or criminal accountability will follow [1] [2] [4]. Watch for upcoming legal filings, congressional inquiries, body‑camera or surveillance releases, and federal charges or exonerations; these procedural developments will determine whether these incidents represent individual tragedies, systemic failures, or both [1] [2] [6].