Common antisemitic tropes and their origins?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Antisemitic tropes fall into recurring themes — claims of Jewish control or excessive power; accusations of disloyalty or “dual loyalty”; money, greed and banking stereotypes; blood libels and deicide; Holocaust denial and conspiracies — all of which have documented medieval to modern origins and continue to mutate online today [1] [2] [3]. Major organizations including the ADL, AJC, World Jewish Congress and the US Holocaust Memorial Museum trace these tropes’ persistence and their contemporary amplification through social media and political discourse [1] [4] [5].
1. Power and world‑domination: the octopus and The Protocols
One of the oldest and most durable tropes portrays Jews as secretly controlling finance, media, governments and global institutions. This image was popularized in modern form by The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (early 20th century) and reinforced visually by Nazi-era cartoons such as the “Jew as octopus,” later recycled internationally [2] [6]. Contemporary variants name billionaire “globalists” or specific Jewish figures while claiming a unified, malign Jewish elite — a narrative the ADL says has evolved into modern myths about Jewish power [1] [7].
2. Wealth, greed and finance: long‑running economic scapegoating
Stereotypes linking Jews to excessive wealth, usury and control of banks date back centuries and have been repackaged repeatedly. Facing History and the ADL document how the “wealth and greed” trope persists in images of “rich, fat Jewish men” and in pandemic- and crisis-era conspiracy claims that blame Jews for economic and social harms [8] [1]. The American Jewish Committee and others say these ideas are being used today to frame Jews as the cause of complex global problems [4].
3. Dual loyalty and disloyalty: political scapegoating
Antisemites have long alleged Jews owe primary loyalty to a transnational “world Jewry” rather than their own countries — a claim invoked in both premodern accusations and 20th‑century politics [2]. Governments and movements have exploited that trope to purge or marginalize Jewish citizens, as in 20th‑century Eastern Europe, and modern commentators warn the trope reappears in debates that equate criticism of Israel with delegitimizing Jewish citizens [2] [1] [9].
4. Blood libel and deicide: medieval roots that led to violence
False accusations that Jews murdered Christian children for ritual purposes (blood libel) and the charge that Jews were collectively responsible for Jesus’ death (deicide) originate in the Middle Ages — the blood libel’s first recorded case dates to the 12th century — and produced mob violence and expulsions for centuries [3] [6]. World Jewish Congress materials and historical surveys document how these medieval myths persisted into modern antisemitic theology and propaganda [9] [6].
5. Holocaust denial and historical erasure
Holocaust denialism is framed both as an ideological trope and as a direct attack on facts: organizations identify denial and minimization as a central antisemitic tactic that seeks to absolve perpetrators and erase victims [1]. The US Holocaust Memorial Museum and ADL situate denialism among the core myths that enable contemporary violence against Jewish communities [5] [1].
6. Digital mutation: emojis, memes and algorithmic evasions
Online platforms have allowed older tropes to be retooled into coded or visual forms that evade moderation — from animal emojis used to dehumanize Jews to QAnon-style child‑trafficking claims repurposing the blood libel — making ancient libels viral and harder to track [10] [7]. NGOs warn that social media accelerates the spread and normalization of these tropes [10] [7].
7. Prevalence, normalization and political use
Surveys and guides from the ADL and AJC show high levels of acceptance or repetition of at least one antisemitic trope in broad populations, and document that public figures across the political spectrum sometimes invoke these myths — intentionally or not — which contributes to real-world harassment and violence [11] [4] [1]. The ADL’s materials argue that public leaders must avoid language that echoes these tropes [1].
8. Why context and attribution matter
Sources agree that many tropes have multi-century origins and that their contemporary forms are not new inventions but adaptations [2] [3] [1]. Where sources diverge is in emphasis: some focus on online mechanisms (ISD, BSA) while others emphasize historical continuity and institutional responsibility (ADL, AJC, World Jewish Congress) [7] [10] [1] [4]. Readers should note organizations’ missions: ADL and AJC frame tropes as part of their advocacy against antisemitism, while watchdogs like ISD emphasize digital threat landscapes [1] [7] [4].
Limitations: available sources map origins and modern variants but do not exhaustively list every trope or trace every local history; specific regional examples or statistical trends beyond the cited reports are not found in current reporting (not found in current reporting).