Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the most common myths about the LGBTQ+ community?
Executive summary
Most widely circulated myths about LGBTQ+ people include claims that sexual orientation is a choice, that LGBTQ+ people are mentally disordered or predisposed to child abuse, and that LGBTQ+ relationships or families are inherently unstable; multiple sources explicitly debunk these claims with research and historical analysis [1] [2] [3]. Coverage in advocacy, health, and education outlets also highlights trans-specific myths — for example about athletic participation or safety — and shows those narratives are politically weaponized in recent legislation and public debate [4] [5].
1. Myth: “Being LGBTQ+ is a choice” — Origins, persistence, and the evidence
A persistent claim is that sexual orientation or gender identity is a deliberate choice; this myth underpins arguments to withhold rights or deny protections. Educational and research summaries note that decades of study treat LGBTQ+ identity as an identity (not a voluntary “choice”) and emphasize long-term research showing identity is not changeable by simple will [5]. Debunking pieces trace how political and religious actors have amplified “choice” rhetoric to argue against nondiscrimination policies and inclusion [1] [2].
2. Myth: “Homosexuality is a disease or mental disorder” — The scientific refutation
Historically, pathologizing claims were advanced by early psychiatrists; but landmark research and professional shifts overturned that view. Reporting on historical work (such as Evelyn Hooker’s) and contemporary overviews state that homosexuality is not a disease and that comparative studies found no inherent mental instability tied to sexual orientation [1]. Live Science and other summaries conclude that research does not support labeling gay people as mentally disordered [3].
3. Myth: “LGBTQ+ parents are unfit or more likely to abuse children” — How that claim was manufactured and rebutted
A longstanding and damaging myth alleges same‑sex parents harm children or are more likely to molest them; watchdog reporting traces those claims to discredited researchers and advocacy groups that have been repeatedly debunked [2]. The Southern Poverty Law Center catalogues how junk studies and selective citations perpetuate this falsehood and notes that reliable research does not support the assertion that same‑sex parents are more likely to abuse children [2] [3].
4. Myth: “Gay and lesbian relationships don’t last / are less stable” — Data-driven counters
Some portrayals suggest LGBTQ+ relationships are uniquely unstable. Multiple contemporary summaries point to studies comparing relationship strain across same‑sex and different‑sex couples and to larger datasets indicating relationship durability is not a function of sexual orientation alone [1] [6] [7]. Analysts argue that social stressors (stigma, legal exclusion) — not inherent instability — explain many observed differences in wellbeing metrics [7].
5. Myth: “Trans athletes cheat / threaten safety in women’s sports” — Legal and scientific context
Advocates and civil‑liberties groups identify several targeted myths about transgender athletes — for example, that their participation creates unfair advantages or threatens cisgender women’s safety. The ACLU explicitly frames those claims as inaccurate and politically motivated, arguing that the myths are used to justify discriminatory legislation and that medical and sports experts have been used to rebut simplistic assertions [4]. Available sources show this debate is highly litigious and coordinated by political groups [4].
6. Myth: “Gender‑neutral spaces are only for LGBTQ+ people and are unsafe” — What the reporting shows
Claims that gender‑neutral bathrooms or facilities are threats to safety often rest on fear rather than evidence. ThoughtWorks and education resources explain that gender‑neutral restrooms are designed for universal use and that safety arguments have been used rhetorically to oppose inclusion measures [8] [9]. Human‑rights guidance urges reframing such facilities as inclusive, not exclusive, and points to how safety claims can mask political agendas [10].
7. Why these myths persist — politics, selective research, and social distance
Analysts across advocacy and journalistic pieces link persistence to coordinated anti‑LGBTQ campaigns, selective or discredited studies reused by interest groups, and the isolating effect of not personally knowing LGBTQ+ people; all three factors keep myths alive despite contrary evidence [2] [7] [1]. Some sources call out explicit agendas: anti‑LGBTQ organizations recycle debunked “science” to shape law and public opinion [2].
8. How to respond — Practical debunking and limitations in the reporting
Guides recommend countering myths with clear facts (e.g., citing long‑standing research on identity, parenting outcomes, and relationship data) and pointing readers to reputable studies rather than anecdotes [1] [6]. Limitations: the provided sources emphasize debunking and advocacy rather than listing every counterstudy; available sources do not mention certain niche claims beyond those catalogued here, so readers should consult primary scientific literature for technical disputes [7] [2].
Notes on sources and bias: pieces from advocacy organizations (ACLU, SPLC) and community publications focus on rights and debunking misinformation and therefore emphasize political uses of myths [4] [2]. Educational and mainstream explainers (ThoughtWorks, Live Science, BestColleges) stress research consensus and practical guidance for allies and institutions [8] [3] [5]. Readers should weigh motive and consult the underlying studies these outlets cite when seeking granular empirical detail [7] [6].