Is the complete text of the board of peace charter available online?

1. Where the full text appears to be published online

The Times of Israel posted what it labeled “Full text: Charter of Trump’s Board of Peace,” presenting a complete version it said it had obtained and verified, and that copy is available on its site ^[1]; Middle East Eye likewise published “the full text” online ^[2]; the Center for Israel Education reposted a draft charter ^[3]; and document-aggregator PrimaryNewsSource hosts the charter as a sourced document ^[4], meaning multiple independent outlets have made the draft charter accessible to readers on the internet.

2. Official U.S. channels and corroborating reporting

The White House and the administration have promoted the Board and its objectives in statements and briefings, but the White House pages in the sources focus on policy announcements and the Board’s role rather than serving as the exclusive public depository for the charter text cited by media ^{[6] [7]}. Major news organizations — including The New York Times and Reuters as reported and summarized in the sources — say they have seen or been sent the proposed charter circulated to national capitals, which corroborates that a text exists and has been shared with diplomats ^{[8] [9]}.

3. What the published text contains and why that matters

Reporting based on the published charter emphasizes clauses that dramatically expand the Board’s global scope and vest significant powers in the chairman — including agenda control, the ability to invite or remove members, veto-like authorities, and the right to designate a successor — findings drawn directly from the charter versions made public by outlets such as RTE, People’s Daily, The Guardian’s reading of the text, and The New York Times’ review ^{[10] [5] [11] [8]}. Those passages are central to critics’ arguments that the charter deviates from the narrower Gaza-focused mandate some governments believed they were endorsing, a point repeatedly noted in media summaries of the circulated full text ^{[9] [11]}.

4. Questions of provenance, authenticity and editorial framing

Multiple outlets state they “obtained and verified” the document (Times of Israel, People’s Daily, Middle East Eye) and Wikipedia and Britannica summarize the charter’s content as reported by those media, but none of the sources in the set point to a single universally agreed-upon official archive where the charter was first posted for public, legal deposit — the White House calls the U.S. the designated depositary per the charter text, but media-hosted copies currently provide the most direct public access described in these reports ^{[1] [5] [9] [6]}. Consequently, while the complete charter text is available online via multiple reputable outlets, readers should note that independent verification procedures differ by outlet and that some governments and analysts dispute the charter’s scope and legitimacy based on its published language ^{[8] [11]}.

5. Bottom line and reporting limits

The complete text of the Board of Peace charter can be read online through several media and document-hosting sites cited here — for example, Times of Israel and Middle East Eye — and major news organizations report having seen the same circulated draft ^{[1] [2] [8]}. The present review is limited to the documents and reporting in the supplied sources; it cannot independently authenticate the provenance beyond those publishers’ claims nor confirm whether a central government or treaty depository has formally published the same final instrument in a way that would resolve outstanding procedural or legal questions raised by critics ^{[1] [4] [6]}.