Which countries report the highest number of social media–related arrests per day?

Checked on January 10, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The clearest, sourced claim for social media–related arrests per day comes from UK reporting: The Times’ freedom-of-information finding—cited in Freedom House’s country report—says police were making roughly 30 arrests a day for “offensive online messages,” translating to over 12,000 arrests in 2023 under specific communications laws [1]. There is no comparable, systematically compiled global dataset in the supplied reporting that converts country-by-country arrest totals into reliable “per day” rates; instead the other sources document episodic arrests and patterns of enforcement in states such as Turkey, China and India and an index-style cross-country indicator of monitoring versus arrests [2] [3].

1. The UK: the only country in the supplied reporting with a near-daily arrest figure

The Freedom House country report for the UK cites a Times FOI finding that more than 12,000 people were arrested in 2023 under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 and section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988, a volume that the newspaper summarized as roughly 30 arrests per day for offensive online messages; the same Freedom House summary notes annual arrests have more than doubled since 2017 though fewer than one in ten of those arrests in 2023 resulted in sentencing [1].

2. Snapshot evidence from other countries: arrests happen frequently but daily rates are absent

Index on Censorship’s roundup documents many well-publicized examples of people arrested over social media in countries including Turkey, China and India—cases ranging from satirical posts about a president to retweets construed as “disturbing social order” and even arrests for “liking” posts—but that reporting is case-based and does not supply steady per-day arrest metrics comparable to the UK figure [2].

3. Comparative indicators exist but don’t equal per-day arrest counts

The Digital Society Project offers a scatterplot and indicators comparing government social media monitoring and arrests for political content, which is useful for gauging relative repression and surveillance, but it does not provide a simple ranked list of arrests per day by country; that tool is better for comparative analysis of monitoring intensity rather than absolute daily arrest numbers [3].

4. Caveats, definitions and hidden agendas that shape apparent rankings

Reported arrest totals mix different legal provisions and enforcement practices—UK figures come from arrests under specific communications laws, not a bespoke “social media arrests” category, and media coverage (e.g., The Times) can frame FOI returns in attention-grabbing ways; advocacy outlets and indexes highlight illustrative or high-profile cases in authoritarian contexts to document repression, which can create a perception of systematic daily arrest rates even when comparable statistics are absent [1] [2]. The lack of a standardized global definition (what counts as “social media–related arrest”) and uneven transparency across police forces and regimes means any cross-country per-day ranking would be provisional at best [3].

5. Measured conclusion: who reports the most arrests per day in available reporting

Based on the supplied reporting, the United Kingdom is the only country with a concrete, sourced estimate — roughly 30 arrests per day for offensive online messages in 2023 as reported via a Times FOI and summarized in Freedom House’s account — and thus would top a list constructed strictly from these sources [1]. Other countries in the supplied material (Turkey, China, India) clearly arrest people over social media, sometimes for political expression or satire, but the reporting does not give reliable per-day counts to place them quantitatively against the UK figure [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
How do different countries define and record "social media–related arrests" in police or judicial statistics?
What methodologies could produce a comparable global dataset of arrests for online speech, and who has attempted it?
How have legal reforms like the UK Online Safety Act changed arrest and prosecution patterns for online speech since 2023?