What countries currently Jews are not welcome and allowed?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Claims that Jews are formally “not welcome” or legally banned across entire modern countries are tied to historical expulsions and a recurring antisemitic myth that Jews have been expelled from 109 countries — a slogan used by white supremacists and debunked by contemporary analysts [1] [2]. Historical expulsions and episodes of violent removal from Arab countries, Iran and many European polities are documented, but modern reporting and fact‑checks show the 109‑countries figure is an exaggeration and a distortion of complex histories [3] [4] [5].
1. A myth given a number: the “109 countries” trope
The phrase “expelled from 109 countries” is a widely circulated antisemitic talking point; the Anti‑Defamation League and multiple debunking pieces trace it to extremist sources and show it is used as numeric shorthand by antisemites to argue Jews are inherently undesirable [1] [6]. Educators and journalists who unpack the claim note it conflates very different events — forced expulsions, population flight, local massacres, temporary bans and regional political changes — into a single, misleading tally [7] [2].
2. History: real expulsions, complex contexts
There are many documented historical expulsions and mass departures of Jewish communities — for example medieval and early‑modern European expulsions and the large departures from Arab countries and Iran in the mid‑20th century — but each episode had specific political, economic or religious causes rather than a single, uniform policy applied across “109 countries” [4] [3]. Sources tracing the exodus from Arab countries and Iran emphasize the mid‑20th century context around the establishment of Israel and local policies that made life untenable for many Jews, resulting in mass migration rather than a simple checklist of expulsions [3] [8].
3. Modern legal status vs. social exclusion
Contemporary reporting and advocacy groups document policies that can restrict Jewish religious practice (for example bans on kosher slaughter in several European countries) and note that some states do not recognize Israel diplomatically, affecting Israeli passport holders — but these are not the same as blanket bans on Jews as people entering or living in a country [9] [10]. Available sources do not list modern sovereign states that have enacted explicit, country‑wide legal bans on Jews as a class; the “109” claim is not supported as a catalogue of current legal exclusions [1] [2].
4. Where Jews have become tiny or absent: migration, intimidation, and policy
Jewish communities have dwindled or disappeared in parts of the Middle East and North Africa largely through combinations of persecution, insecurity and emigration; for example, the post‑1948 period saw hundreds of thousands leave or be expelled from Arab countries and Iran, leaving only small remnants by the 21st century [3] [8]. Reporting frames that exodus as a real historical fact while also underscoring that those events were driven by region‑specific upheavals rather than a global blacklist [3] [8].
5. Contemporary manifestations of exclusionary sentiment
Antisemitic incidents and local efforts to exclude Jews — such as “Jew‑free” signs, social boycotts, or efforts to restrict religious practice — are reported in parts of Europe and elsewhere and pose real danger even when no national law bans Jews outright [11] [9]. These actions are sometimes prosecuted (for example investigations into discriminatory signs) while other measures, like restrictions on ritual slaughter, have sparked legal and constitutional battles that expose tensions between animal‑welfare rules and religious freedom [9] [11].
6. How to read competing claims and numbers
Reliable analysis separates different categories: historic expulsions (localized and often centuries ago), mid‑20th‑century mass departures (notably from Arab countries and Iran), contemporary social exclusion and legal restrictions that affect practice or travel, and extremist propaganda that aggregates them into a single figure [4] [3] [1]. Fact‑checkers and educators advise caution with sound‑bite numbers: the 109 figure is a rhetorical weapon, not a scholarly census [1] [7].
7. Limitations and what reporting does not say
Available sources do not provide a current list of globally sovereign states that legally bar Jews from entry or residence as a class; claims that a precise set of modern countries “do not allow Jews” are not substantiated in the provided reporting (not found in current reporting). The sources do show historical expulsions, significant post‑1948 population shifts, modern discrimination and the propagation of the 109‑countries myth [4] [3] [1].
Takeaway: Jews have been expelled or compelled to flee in many historical episodes and face contemporary discrimination in varied forms; the neat number “109” is a modern antisemitic shortcut that flattens complex histories and should not be read as a literal list of countries today [1] [2].