Fact check: Steph Curry and his wife have fought against affordable housing built in their town.

1. Summary of the results

1. Summary of the results:

The Currys did write a letter opposing a specific 16-unit townhome development near their $30-million Atherton home, citing privacy and safety concerns. However, their opposition was relatively measured, suggesting alternatives like taller fencing if the development proceeded. The development would have included 4 affordable housing units out of 16 total units.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints:

• This was part of a broader California state mandate requiring Atherton to plan for 348 housing units by 2031
• The Currys' opposition was mild compared to other Atherton residents who more aggressively fought against the housing plan
• The city ultimately kept the 23 Oakwood project in its housing plan despite resident objections
• The property in question was already a single-family home, so this represented an increase in housing density
• Wealthy communities across California are facing similar mandates to increase housing density, making this a broader societal issue rather than just about the Currys

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement:

• The statement oversimplifies by suggesting the Currys fought against "affordable housing" in general, when they opposed one specific development that was primarily market-rate housing (12 out of 16 units)
• It omits that their opposition was part of a larger community response, potentially painting them as uniquely opposed
• The phrase "fought against" implies stronger opposition than what actually occurred - they wrote one letter suggesting alternatives
• The statement benefits those seeking to portray wealthy individuals as universally opposed to affordable housing, while the reality shows a more nuanced situation where property owners, including the Currys, are balancing personal concerns with community needs