Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

2 genders

Checked on November 16, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The idea that there are “two genders” describes the gender binary — a social system that classifies people as male or female — and remains the dominant framework in many societies, but scholars and medical researchers increasingly describe sex and gender as more complex than a strict two-part division (see definitions and critiques) [1] [2]. Psychological research finds that defending a strict binary often correlates with stronger gender identification and resistance to gender-neutral language or recognition of non-binary people [3].

1. What people commonly mean by “two genders” — a social classification that organizes life

When people assert “there are two genders,” they usually refer to a binary system that assigns roles, expectations and identities as either masculine/men or feminine/women; this system ties gender attributes to biological sex in many cultures and underpins everyday practices from bathrooms to forms of address [1] [4].

2. Scientific and clinical perspectives: sex and gender are not identical

Contemporary scientific and medical literature distinguishes sex (biological traits such as chromosomes, gonads, hormones and genitalia) from gender (social roles, identity and expression), and notes that biological sex itself is not always a simple binary because of intersex variations and developmental complexity [2] [1]. The scientific perspective described in a peer-reviewed article argues recent data indicate sex is not a simple binary classification and that biomedical understanding of differences has evolved [2].

3. Social-science research on why the binary persists

Psychological research shows that people with strong gender identification and a need for closure are more likely to defend the sex/gender binary, express prejudice against non-binary people, and oppose gender-neutral pronouns; those dynamics help explain social resistance to recognizing more than two genders [3].

4. Cultural and historical counterexamples to a strict binary

Historians and anthropologists note that many cultures historically recognized more than two gender roles or were more flexible about gender expression; critics argue the strict two-category model is not universal and was reinforced in particular ways through Western colonial and social structures [5] [1]. Some contemporary commentators link the binary to power structures and argue dismantling it challenges entrenched hierarchies [6] [7].

5. Activist, medical and policy responses: recognition and backlash

Because some governments, institutions and advocacy groups have moved to recognize non-binary identities (e.g., gender‑neutral pronouns or third‑gender legal categories), these changes have provoked public debate and resistance; the psychological study cited specifically ties opposition to those changes to individual differences in identity and cognitive closure [3]. Medical and legal recognition of non-binary identities is described as an expression of acknowledgment and respect for gender diversity in the medical literature [2].

6. Common misunderstandings and where sources differ

A common misunderstanding is collapsing sex and gender: sources emphasize they are distinct concepts and that evidence about biological sex’s complexity does not automatically resolve every ethical or policy question [2] [1]. Some writers and commentators assert the binary is fundamentally false and socially constructed, while others defend its usefulness for classification and policy; encyclopedic and journalistic sources note both the proponents’ practical framing and critics’ concerns about discrimination [4] [8].

7. What the research does and does not settle

Available sources indicate there is scholarly disagreement: biology and medicine increasingly document complexity in sex characteristics and the legitimacy of non-binary identities, while other scholars and commentators continue to debate how sex and gender categories should be used in law and public policy [2] [9]. Available sources do not mention a single, settled global consensus that reduces the debate to a simple yes/no answer about “two genders” (not found in current reporting).

8. Practical implications for policy, workplaces and conversation

Because the gender binary shapes rules and social expectations, debates over whether to maintain, reform, or expand categories affect bathrooms, data collection, anti-discrimination protections and personal recognition; psychological findings imply reforms will provoke resistance among people who strongly identify with binary categories unless policies and education address underlying attitudes [3] [4].

Conclusion — the central fact is not a simple count but a contested set of meanings: “two genders” names a longstanding social system that many still use, yet medical, historical and social-science sources describe meaningful reasons to treat both sex and gender as more complex than a strict binary [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What scientific evidence supports the concept of two genders?
How do gender identity and biological sex differ across cultures?
What legal implications arise from defining only two genders?
How have views on non-binary and gender-diverse identities changed since 2020?
How do schools and workplaces accommodate people who are not within a binary gender model?