Do gay people commit more violent crimes than heterosexuals?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The best available, peer-reviewed and government data do not support the claim that gay people commit more violent crimes than heterosexuals; instead, large national surveys show sexual and gender minorities suffer disproportionately high rates of violent victimization, while studies of perpetration produce mixed and often contradictory results across subgroups and contexts [1] [2] [3]. Some academic work finds lower rates of physical aggression among gay men compared with heterosexual men in population samples, while other studies note elevated arrests or incarceration for LGBTQ+ people — a pattern that reflects complex intersections of victimization, policing, and social marginalization rather than clear higher intrinsic criminality [4] [5].
1. What the data actually show about victimization, not perpetration
Multiple nationally representative analyses demonstrate that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people are more likely to be victims of violent crime than straight, cisgender people: the Bureau of Justice Statistics reported violent-victimization rates for lesbian and gay persons at roughly 43.5 per 1,000 versus 19.0 per 1,000 for straight persons in 2017–2020 [1], and peer-reviewed analyses of NCVS data confirm higher rates for gay and bisexual men and for bisexual women even after controlling for demographic factors [2] [3]. Independent research institutions have reached similar conclusions; the Williams Institute has repeatedly found markedly elevated violent-victimization rates for LGBT populations in NCVS analyses [6] [7].
2. Perpetration studies are smaller, mixed, and context-dependent
By contrast, research that directly measures perpetration of violent or sexual offending among sexual minorities is sparser, often uses non-representative samples, and yields heterogeneous findings: some clinical and relationship-focused studies found substantial rates of intimate-partner perpetration among lesbian and gay samples (for example, self-reports in a 283-person study), with lesbians reporting higher mutual perpetration rates than gay men in that sample [8], while more recent, broader comparative studies of sexual violence perpetrators found few consistent differences between gay/lesbian and heterosexual adults and in some cases found lower rates among gay men [9] [10]. Population research in the Netherlands reported gay males displayed lower levels of physical aggression and criminal behavior compared with heterosexual males [4].
3. Arrests and incarceration reflect structures, not only behavior
Claims that LGBTQ+ people are “more criminal” are complicated by criminal-justice contact data showing overrepresentation of LGBTQ+ people in arrests and incarceration; a MacArthur-commissioned report and related summaries note LGBTQ+ individuals are more likely to be arrested and incarcerated than straight peers, with worse outcomes for people of color [5]. Those system-level disparities can arise from policing practices, bias, socioeconomic vulnerability, homelessness, and survivorship of violence — factors that increase exposure to criminal-justice processes without proving higher propensity to commit violent crime [11] [3].
4. Subgroup differences matter — bisexual and transgender populations show different risk profiles
Analyses repeatedly highlight that “LGBT” is not monolithic: bisexual people, especially bisexual women, often show higher victimization rates and in some models higher odds of both being victimized and of certain violent outcomes compared with lesbians or gay men [2] [3], and transgender people experience particularly high rates of violent victimization [11] [12]. These within-group contrasts indicate any simple comparison — “gay vs. straight” — obscures important heterogeneity and mechanisms like age, income, and intersectional marginalization [2] [3].
5. Bottom line and caveats
There is no authoritative body of evidence concluding that gay people, as a group, commit more violent crimes than heterosexuals; the preponderance of high-quality national data documents elevated rates of victimization for sexual and gender minorities rather than elevated perpetration, and population studies sometimes find lower aggression among gay men [1] [2] [4]. Important caveats remain: perpetration research is limited and often context-specific, criminal-justice contact is shaped by structural bias and vulnerability, and risks vary sharply across bisexual, transgender, lesbian, and gay subgroups [8] [5] [3]. Where claims about “more violent crimes” circulate, scrutiny should demand clear definitions (victimization vs. perpetration), representative data, and attention to systemic factors — questions the current literature is still working to answer comprehensively [9] [10].