Are immigrants going to the uk to intentionally commit crimes

Checked on December 2, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Available data do not support a simple claim that immigrants come to the UK to “intentionally commit crimes.” Government and research sources show mixed patterns: non-UK nationals made up about 12.4% of the prison population in June 2025 and around 13% of cautions and convictions in 2024 (noting gaps in nationality recording) [1]. Independent briefings and academic reviews caution that arrest and conviction statistics can be distorted by policing practices, data limitations, and differing demographic profiles [2] [3].

1. Crime numbers: what official statistics actually show

Home Office and prison-population reporting show that a minority of people in prison are non-UK nationals — roughly 12.4% in mid‑2025 — and non-citizens accounted for about 13% of cautions and convictions in 2024, but those snapshots do not reveal migrants’ length of residence or immigration status [1]. The Home Office also publishes summary statistics on foreign national offenders but warns its systems have data quality issues that limit detailed analysis by offence type, sentence length and nationality [4].

2. Arrests, convictions and raw rates are not the whole story

Experts emphasise that arrest and conviction counts can over- or understate the real incidence of offending among migrants because data often fail to capture how long a person has lived in the UK, their immigration status, and differential police practices toward different communities [2]. The Migration Observatory explains more complex methods are needed to assess causation between immigration and crime, because simple foreign-born vs UK-born comparisons can be misleading [2].

3. Variation by group, place and time — no uniform pattern

Research cited in review articles finds mixed results: some studies show little or no effect of immigration on crime in places like London, other analyses identify modest increases in property crime after particular inflows, and still others find no causal link or even links to falling crime rates following immigration waves [3] [2]. That heterogeneity means outcomes depend on the migrant group, local labour-market opportunities, policing and broader social conditions [2] [3].

4. Political and think‑tank claims need scrutiny

Some recent analyses cited in public debate have stark headlines — for example, a 2025 analysis by the Centre for Migration Control reportedly found non‑British citizens were about 3.5 times more likely than British citizens to be arrested for sexual offences — but such claims come from an anti‑immigration think tank and must be read against the broader evidence base and data limitations [3]. Migration Watch UK and like‑minded organisations also highlight risks and security concerns, but their framings reflect explicit policy positions and should be weighed with independent data [5].

5. Refugees and asylum seekers: a specific blind spot

Scottish and UK government reporting does not publish routine statistics that link recorded crimes specifically to people who are seeking asylum or have refugee status, and journalists and analysts note there is little recent research isolating refugees’ impact on crime rates [6]. The Ferret’s explainer highlights the difficulty of drawing conclusions because local deprivation, housing and addiction often correlate with crime independently of immigration [6].

6. Organised immigration crime and different phenomena

There is a clear distinction between individual offending and organised criminal networks that exploit migration routes. The National Crime Agency focuses on organised immigration crime — people‑smuggling and the harms around Channel crossings — and documents rising fatalities and sophisticated smuggling operations; that threat is about criminal groups profiting from migration, not migrants arriving with an intent to commit ordinary crimes [7].

7. What the evidence does not answer

Available sources stress major data gaps: there are no reliable national statistics linking convictions to immigration status or length of residence in a way that would show whether people committed crimes before or after arriving, or whether they intended to offend on arrival [1] [4]. Therefore assertions that immigrants “go to the UK to intentionally commit crimes” are not supported by the data currently published [1] [4].

8. Bottom line for readers

Current official data and independent reviews show a nuanced picture: migrants are represented in the criminal justice system at measurable rates, but those figures are shaped by policing, data limitations, group differences and socio‑economic contexts, and they do not prove a deliberate pattern of migration for criminal intent [1] [2]. Readers should treat single‑study or advocacy‑group headlines with caution and look to comprehensive, transparent government reporting and independent reviews for context [4] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
Do immigration patterns correlate with crime rates in the UK since 2010?
What does UK government data say about convictions by immigration status?
How do criminologists explain links between migration and criminal behavior?
Are specific migrant groups overrepresented in certain offences in the UK?
What impact do integration policies and socioeconomics have on migrant crime rates?