Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Fox News is claiming SNAP benefits are going to illegal / pending immigrants.
Executive Summary
Fox News’ blanket claim that SNAP benefits are being given to “illegal” or pending immigrants is inconsistent with federal eligibility rules and recent USDA guidance: undocumented non-citizens are ineligible for SNAP, and the overwhelming majority of recipients are U.S. citizens. Political and policy changes, congressional inquiries, and state-level funding shortfalls have produced confusion and selective reporting that fuel this claim.
1. What supporters of the claim are saying and why it gained traction
Advocates of the claim emphasize anecdotes and political concerns that SNAP dollars flow to non-citizens, using phrases like “illegal migrants” or “pending immigrants” to suggest broad eligibility. Congressman DesJarlais explicitly voiced this concern in a letter requesting data on non‑citizen SNAP enrollment and costs, framing the issue around perceived reporting gaps and border policy [1]. Those advancing the claim often conflate different immigration statuses — asylum-seekers, lawful permanent residents, refugees, and undocumented migrants — which amplifies public misunderstanding. The political framing matters: state and national actors have tied SNAP to immigration debates, pressing media and officials for clarity while sometimes emphasizing exceptions or short-term program changes to support broader claims [2].
2. What federal rules and USDA guidance actually say
Federal statute and USDA guidance restrict SNAP to U.S. citizens and certain lawfully present non-citizens; undocumented non-citizens are not eligible for SNAP. USDA documents and updated guidance reiterated this longstanding rule, clarifying that eligibility has never extended to those without lawful status [3] [4]. SNAP eligibility also includes income and resource tests, and many categories of non‑citizens are eligible only under narrowly defined conditions (naturalized citizens, some lawful permanent residents, refugees, and asylees until recent changes), which complicates snapshots that ignore program rules [5]. The plain legal framework undercuts any assertion that SNAP broadly funds undocumented migrants.
3. Recent policy developments and congressional pressure that complicate the picture
Recent congressional inquiries and executive or legislative shifts have altered and spotlighted who receives benefits. DesJarlais’ request to USDA and DHS and public statements by state officials underscore political pressure to quantify non‑citizen access [1]. Simultaneously, some legislative actions have tightened eligibility for categories such as refugees or asylees, producing real cuts in certain localities and feeding narratives that benefits were previously more accessible [6]. These policy moves and inquiries create a patchwork effect: one can lawfully say the law excludes undocumented immigrants while also accurately reporting that policy changes have removed access for some previously eligible non‑citizen groups.
4. Local impacts and real examples that feed confusion
On the ground, communities report tangible changes: thousands of refugees, asylees, and trafficking survivors in places like Cuyahoga County have lost SNAP access after eligibility rules changed, prompting increased demand on nonprofits and local emergency responses [6]. At the same time, states such as New York declared emergencies tied to SNAP funding shortfalls, elevating media coverage and public anxiety about program capacity [2]. Local disruptions are real and newsworthy, but they reflect shifts in categorical eligibility and funding, not evidence that SNAP is provisioning undocumented immigrants broadly.
5. Data on who receives SNAP: majority citizens, small non‑citizen share
Empirical data undermines the stronger versions of the claim: USDA and fact‑checking analyses show most SNAP recipients are U.S.-born citizens (about 89.4% in one USDA-cited analysis), with non‑citizen households representing a small share [7]. USDA and policy experts consistently note that undocumented people are ineligible and that non‑citizen participation is limited to specific lawful categories [8] [5]. Thus the data indicate that SNAP is not a general conduit for undocumented migrants, and major public claims that “millions” or “broad swaths” of benefits go to the undocumented lack support in available administrative and survey evidence.
6. Reconciling the claim with policy reality and the implications for reporting
The truth is mixed: the legal framework and USDA guidance clearly bar undocumented immigrants from SNAP, and data shows citizens are the majority of recipients [3] [7]. Yet policy changes, political inquiries, and localized eligibility cuts for certain non‑citizen categories produce real disruptions and talking points that opponents or proponents can selectively cite [1] [6]. For accurate public conversation, reporting must distinguish between undocumented people (who are ineligible), lawful non‑citizen subsets (some eligible, some not), and the fiscal or operational impacts of recent legislative or administrative changes. Clearer data reporting from USDA and targeted public communication would reduce confusion and prevent conflation of anecdote with systemic fact [5] [4].