Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How does immigration affect crime rate
Executive summary
Most recent, credible research assembled by academics and policy groups finds that immigration in the United States is not associated with higher crime—and in many studies immigrant shares have correlated with falling crime rates over decades [1] [2]. Some local and country comparisons show exceptions or different patterns (including higher arrest or incarceration rates for noncitizens in some datasets), and right‑wing or anti‑immigration groups sometimes produce analyses that contradict the mainstream findings [3] [4].
1. What the major studies and policy centers say: immigrants are not driving U.S. crime declines
Large surveys of research by the Migration Policy Institute, the American Immigration Council and academic teams conclude that immigrants—both documented and undocumented in many analyses—are less likely or no more likely to commit crimes than U.S.‑born residents, and that increases in immigrant population shares have coincided with long‑term declines in national crime rates [2] [1] [5]. National studies find immigrants of all legal statuses commit crimes at lower rates than the U.S.‑born, and city‑level work even links rising immigration to falling homicide and property crime in some municipalities [2] [1].
2. Historical and cross‑sectional evidence: 150 years of data and recent decades
Long‑run research that traces incarceration and arrest patterns over many decades finds that since about 1960 immigrants have been less likely to be incarcerated than U.S.‑born men; the pattern reverses in earlier historical periods but not in the modern era [4] [6]. Likewise, analyses comparing state‑level immigrant shares and crime rates from 1980–2022 show immigrant share rising while total crime fell sharply, with statistical tests finding no positive correlation between immigrant share and state crime rates [1].
3. Findings about unauthorized immigrants and “criminal aliens” are nuanced
Federal enforcement data and some local enforcement tallies show large numbers of immigrants with prior convictions or arrests encountered by ICE or Border Patrol (for example data summaries of criminal‑alien arrests), but those enforcement counts do not by themselves prove immigrants cause higher community crime rates; researchers note enforcement, policing practices and record linkage affect such tallies [7] [8]. Multiple studies specifically examining unauthorized immigrants conclude they do not increase violent crime and in some datasets have lower offending or incarceration rates than U.S.‑born residents [9] [2].
4. Studies that find higher immigrant arrest or conviction rates — and why they differ
Some country‑level or think‑tank reports (including at least one recent UK analysis cited on Wikipedia) report higher arrest or imprisonment rates for noncitizens in particular categories, such as sexual offenses or overall imprisonment in some jurisdictions [3]. Researchers caution those figures can reflect policing practices, migration‑related offenses, documentation issues, and judicial treatment that inflate apparent rates versus true underlying offending—so differences in measurement and sample period often explain divergent results [3].
5. Mechanisms researchers propose for lower immigrant offending
Economists and criminologists suggest several mechanisms: first‑generation immigrants often have stronger labor incentives, family ties, and social networks that reduce criminal risk; immigrant neighborhoods can strengthen social cohesion and informal control; and inclusive policies or well‑established immigrant populations can further lower violent crime [4] [2]. Conversely, studies also show that under certain adverse conditions—such as labor market exclusion or intense marginalization—immigration could be associated with localized increases in some crimes, which is why context matters [3].
6. Policy debates and the role of enforcement, reporting and data quality
Political narratives (especially during election seasons) often highlight high‑profile crimes to argue migrants raise crime, whereas policy researchers emphasize population‑level data that show no overall increase [10] [5]. Data limitations—different measures (arrests vs convictions vs incarceration), selective enforcement, and underreporting in immigrant communities—mean framing and measurement choices change outcomes; several researchers call for more nuanced, disaggregated analysis rather than blanket claims [11] [3].
7. Bottom line for readers: what to accept and what to question
Accept that a preponderance of recent academic and policy research finds immigration does not increase—and can associate with decreases in—crime rates in the U.S. [1] [2]. Question claims based on raw enforcement counts or single‑country snapshots without context: such figures may reflect police practices, migration offenses, or selective datasets rather than a causal link from immigration to more community crime [7] [3]. Available sources do not mention every country or local area, so local patterns should be evaluated with local data and attention to measurement choices (not found in current reporting).