Https://lisevoldeng.substack.com/p/dont-worry-boys-are-hard-to-find

1. What the piece claims and how it is presented

The article is framed as a series of victim interviews tied to "Trump/Epstein and associated criminal enterprises," with Part 1 described by the author as containing un‑redacted audio of firsthand accounts alleging child trafficking, torture, rape and murder, a framing the author repeats in an author note on Substack ^{[1] [2]}. The essay sits within Voldeng's "outlaws of chivalry" publication on Substack, which hosts her other essays and archives of related posts ^{[3] [6]}.

2. Who is publishing and what we know about the author

Lisa Noelle Voldeng publishes under a Substack presence and related sites described in her profile and recommendations, with multiple Substack titles and an "about" page that position her work across law, culture and other topics ^{[7] [8] [9]}. Public discussion, including social posts collating responses, indicates readers and commenters are asking about her journalistic credentials and urging corroboration of extraordinary claims, showing active skepticism in online communities ^[4].

3. What the available material does — and does not — verify

The source material provided confirms only that Voldeng posted the interviews and that she asserts possession of audio evidence; the sources do not supply independent verification of the interviews' content, the identities of those involved, nor legal filings or law‑enforcement corroboration tied to the allegations ^{[1] [2]}. The comments and meta pages on Substack signal public engagement, but they do not substitute for corroboration from investigators, court records, or established news outlets ^{[5] [6]}.

4. How to read the piece responsibly given the stakes

Given the gravity of the accusations—trafficking, torture and murder—journalistic norms require independent verification before accepting the claims as established fact; the material supplied shows the author is publishing testimony but does not show independent corroboration or mainstream reporting that would confirm or contextualize the allegations ^{[2] [1]}. Readers and other reporters should treat the work as potentially significant primary material that needs corroboration through public records, interviews with law‑enforcement or named witnesses, and forensic review of any audio or documentary evidence rather than as a concluded investigative finding ^[2].

5. Possible agendas, benefits and risks to assess

The platform (a personal Substack) allows rapid publication of sensational material without traditional editorial gatekeeping, which can surface overlooked testimony but also amplifies unverified claims; critics explicitly question Voldeng's credentials and warn about the risk of echoing unverified conspiracy narratives, while supporters frame the posts as bringing forward survivor testimony that mainstream outlets have ignored ^{[4] [2]}. The public record provided does not resolve which of those frames is correct; readers should weigh both the possibility of uncovering real crimes and the known risk of harm from spreading unverified allegations.

6. Bottom line for readers and other journalists

The piece should be considered a primary-source claim posted on Substack by Lisa Noelle Voldeng that, according to her descriptions, includes unredacted audio claiming severe crimes tied to high-profile figures ^{[2] [1]}; however, the materials in the provided reporting do not provide independent corroboration or established journalistic verification, and public commentary highlights questions about the author's credentials and the need for corroboration ^{[4] [5]}. The responsible next step is verification: seek original audio, confirm chain of custody, locate corroborating witnesses or records, and watch for formal reporting from investigators or reputable news organizations before treating the allegations as established fact ^[2].