Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Which European country has the lowest reported rape rate in 2024?
Executive Summary
Reported claims about which European country had the lowest rape rate in 2024 are inconsistent across the provided sources because data definitions, reporting practices, and coverage vary; the documents supplied name different low-rate countries including Liechtenstein, Albania, and several non-European states depending on the dataset and year. The most defensible statement from these sources is that no single, uncontested European country can be identified as having the lowest reported rape rate in 2024 without clarifying the data source, definition of rape, and whether the statistic refers to police reports, surveys, or UNODC compilations [1] [2] [3].
1. Conflicting low-rate claims — small states and different datasets make headlines
Multiple analyses in the supplied material attribute the lowest reported rates to small or exceptional cases: one piece asserts Liechtenstein recorded zero reported rapes in 2020 and is cited as lowest in a 2020 snapshot [1], while another claims Liechtenstein had no reported cases in 2024 [2]. These statements rely on police-recorded incident counts rather than standardized rates per 100,000 inhabitants or survey prevalence, and small populations amplify year-to-year volatility. The divergence shows that headline claims about “lowest country” are sensitive to whether absolute counts, per-capita rates, or survey-based prevalence are used [1] [2].
2. Broader EU surveys show different patterns — prevalence versus recorded crime
A 2024 EU gender-based violence survey and related reporting emphasize prevalence captured by victimization surveys rather than police statistics, producing different country rankings than police-record data [4] [5]. Surveys often reveal higher prevalence because many incidents are not reported to police, and survey methodology captures unreported victimization, whereas police statistics reflect reporting and recording practices. Thus, a country with low police-recorded rape rates may still have substantial survey-measured prevalence, or conversely, higher recorded rates could indicate better reporting and recording systems rather than more offending [4] [5].
3. International compilations add non-European comparators and timing problems
A compilation citing UNODC-style figures lists global extremes—Lebanon and Botswana in one dataset—with entries spanning 2024 and early 2025, illustrating how international datasets can mix years and jurisdictions and include non-European countries when answering “who is lowest” [6]. Using such compilations without strict temporal and geographic filters produces misleading comparisons. The supplied international summary also underscores that cross-country comparisons must align on year, definitional scope, and source to be meaningful [6].
4. Case example: Albania, Sweden, and the importance of denominators
One dataset highlights Sweden with very high reported sexual violence rates and Albania among the lowest in a 2022 snapshot, demonstrating stark variation across Europe depending on the underlying metric [3]. Sweden’s high rate partly reflects broad legal definitions and vigorous reporting, while Albania’s low rate may reflect underreporting or narrower legal definitions. This contrast shows that comparing per-100,000 rates without accounting for legal definitions, survey inclusion, and reporting culture produces an incomplete picture [3].
5. Small-population effects: why microstates skew “lowest” statistics
Liechtenstein and other microstates repeatedly appear in low-count lists because small absolute numbers produce zero or near-zero rates in single years, yet these figures are statistically unstable [1] [2]. A single reported incident can dramatically alter a per-capita rate in a microstate. Therefore, claims that a microstate “has the lowest rape rate in 2024” are vulnerable to random fluctuation and should be contextualized with multi-year averages or pooled data to reduce volatility effects [1] [2].
6. How reporting practices and definitions shape the answer
All supplied sources stress that differences in legal definitions of rape, recording practices, and willingness to report significantly affect rankings [7] [4]. Countries with expanded legal definitions or strong victim-support and reporting mechanisms may register higher recorded rates despite similar or lower actual prevalence; conversely, low recorded rates can indicate barriers to reporting. Any authoritative claim about the “lowest reported rape rate in 2024” must therefore specify whether it refers to police records, survey prevalence, or UNODC-style compiled rates, and include information on definitions and reporting context [7] [4].
7. Bottom line: current evidence does not support a single, definitive 2024 winner
The materials provided present multiple, incompatible candidates for lowest-reported rape rates depending on source and metric—Liechtenstein (zero counts in some years), Albania (low per-100,000 rates in a 2022 snapshot), and various non-European low entries in international compilations [1] [3] [6]. Given these contradictions and the critical role of definitions, the most accurate conclusion is that the question cannot be answered definitively from the supplied data without specifying the exact dataset, year, and measurement approach; any definitive assertion would require harmonized, source-specified data.