What were the total number of fatalities during the George Floyd protests in 2020?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Different counts have circulated, but contemporary datasets and major news outlets reported between at least six and roughly 25 fatalities in the U.S. tied to the wave of protests after George Floyd’s death in late May 2020: The New York Times put the toll at “at least six” deaths connected to the protests [1], while ACLED’s analysis and reporting cited 25 Americans killed during protests and unrest in 2020 [2]. Sources disagree because they apply different definitions—“connected to,” “during,” or “political-violence” deaths—and because some deaths were criminal acts near protests rather than clearly protest-related [2].
1. Counting deaths: different methods, different totals
Efforts to quantify fatalities tied to the George Floyd protests produced divergent totals because researchers and reporters used distinct methodologies. The New York Times’ timeline reported “at least six people” killed in violence connected to the protests [1]. By contrast, the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED), cited by The Guardian and reporting via its US Crisis Monitor, found that “at least 25 Americans were killed” during protests and political unrest in 2020 — a larger figure that reflects ACLED’s broader event capture and focus on political violence [2]. The discrepancy arises from definitional choices about whether a death that occurred in the vicinity of a demonstration, but stemming from unrelated criminal activity, should be counted as protest-related [2].
2. What “connected to” versus “during” means in practice
Researchers warn that many reports at the time conflated deaths that occurred in proximity to protests with deaths directly caused by protest-related violence. ACLED’s analysis specifically notes that “news reports at the height of demonstrations… cited dozens of deaths,” but that many later turned out to be crimes occurring near protests rather than violence directly tied to demonstrations — ACLED’s dataset is limited to political violence, which narrows what it counts [2]. The New York Times framed its six-person figure as deaths “connected to” the protests, a phrasing that implies a tighter causal link than some headline tallies [1].
3. Geographic and actor complexity behind the numbers
Fatalities spanned multiple cities and involved different actors: protesters, counter-protesters, armed civilians, extremist actors, and law enforcement. Coverage and follow-up investigations identified incidents ranging from targeted shootings (for example, separate extremist-linked attacks) to clashes where National Guard or police used crowd-control tactics; these varied contexts complicated attribution of cause and responsibility [3]. Wikipedia’s compendium on protests and controversies documents multiple violent episodes, extremist agitators such as boogaloo affiliates, and at least five deaths publicly linked to boogaloo rhetoric by September 2020, underscoring the patchwork nature of violent actors [3].
4. Why official and scholarly sources still disagree
Disagreements persist because datasets prioritize different outcomes: some track all deaths occurring during protest periods; others restrict to deaths directly resulting from politically motivated violence. The Justice Department’s internal reporting and FOIA material documented unrest and criminal activity across cities but does not present a single public death tally in the sources provided here [4]. Academic and medical studies focused on injuries from less‑lethal weapons (e.g., Minnesota hospital analyses) stress non-fatal harm and do not attempt a comprehensive death count, leaving a gap between clinical reporting and mortality datasets [5].
5. What the coverage shows about misinformation risks
Early, fragmented reporting led to inflated or unclear numbers in some outlets; ACLED explicitly cautioned that early news reports overstated how many fatalities were truly protest-related [2]. That caveat exposes the misinformation risk when aggregate figures are shared without transparent methodology. Wikipedia and aggregated timelines can be useful summaries but they synthesize many sources with varying rigor and sometimes report evolving counts [6] [3].
6. Bottom line for readers seeking a single number
There is no universally agreed single fatality count in the provided reporting: reputable outlets reported “at least six” directly connected deaths [1] while ACLED’s US Crisis Monitor documented 25 Americans killed “during protests and political unrest” in 2020 [2]. Available sources do not present a definitive consolidated death toll that reconciles these methodological differences; the choice between these figures depends on whether you accept a narrower “connected to” standard [1] or a broader “during unrest” framing used by ACLED [2].