Fact check: How large were the george floyd protests

1. Summary of the results

The George Floyd protests were massive in scale, with estimates suggesting that between 15 million to 26 million people in the United States participated in demonstrations over the death of George Floyd ^[1]. The protests peaked on June 6, with half a million people turning out in nearly 550 places across the United States ^[1]. The movement had a significant global impact, with protests occurring in countries such as the United Kingdom, New Zealand, France, and Colombia ^[2], as well as Peru, Nigeria, Indonesia, Switzerland, and Argentina ^[3]. The Crowd Counting Consortium's dataset shows that the George Floyd uprising has been massive, with nearly 12,000 anti-racism events in the U.S. since May 25, 2020 ^[4]. The vast majority of these events involved no reported property damage ^[4]. The protests were part of the largest racial justice protests in the United States since the Civil Rights Movement ^[2], and brought attention to systemic racism and oppression worldwide ^[5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some key points that are missing from the original statement include:

• The global nature of the protests, with solidarity marches and gatherings taking place in various countries, including Australia, France, and Germany ^[5].
• The inspiration of a new generation of activists ^[2], and the widespread international response to the incident and its underlying issues of police violence and racism ^[3].
• The contours of the George Floyd uprising, including the number of anti-racism events and the lack of reported property damage ^[4].
• The historical context of the protests, including the fact that they were part of the largest racial justice protests in the United States since the Civil Rights Movement ^[2].

Alternative viewpoints that could be considered include:

• The perspectives of law enforcement and government officials, who may have different views on the protests and their impact.
• The experiences of marginalized communities, who may have been disproportionately affected by the protests and their aftermath.
• The role of social media and technology in facilitating the protests and spreading awareness about the issues.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement does not provide any specific numbers or data about the size or scope of the protests, which could lead to misinformation or underestimation of the movement's impact ^[1]. Additionally, the statement does not acknowledge the global nature of the protests, which could be seen as a bias towards a US-centric perspective ^{[2] [3] [5]}. The sources cited suggest that the protests were not limited to the United States, but were part of a larger global movement ^{[2] [3] [5]}. The statement could also be seen as lacking context, as it does not provide any information about the historical context of the protests, the inspiration of a new generation of activists, or the contours of the George Floyd uprising ^{[4] [2] [5]}. Overall, the statement could benefit from a more nuanced and detailed understanding of the George Floyd protests and their impact ^{[1] [2] [4] [3] [5]}.