Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the primary goals of George Soros' Open Society Foundations?
Executive Summary
The Open Society Foundations (OSF) primarily aims to advance justice, human rights, democracy, education, public health, and independent media, while increasingly emphasizing reducing inequality and supporting human-rights ecosystems globally. Recent reporting and OSF statements describe a shift toward longer-term, unrestricted funding, deeper engagement in the Global South (notably Africa), and new program areas such as critical minerals and peace-building [1] [2].
1. What supporters say OSF actually does — a concise claim list that matters
OSF describes its core mission as advancing justice, democracy, education, public health, and independent media, alongside a sustained focus on human rights and reducing inequality; these are repeated across foundation material and recent reporting. The organization emphasizes providing long-term, unrestricted funding to human-rights groups and acting as a form of “political philanthropy” that engages directly with questions of power and structural inequality. This summary reflects the foundation’s stated priorities and recent programmatic shifts rather than external critique [2] [1].
2. Evidence of strategic shifts — new programs and geographic emphasis
Reporting from September 2025 documents OSF’s expanded investment in Africa and the Global South, citing $125.5 million in Africa grants for 2023 and the launch of a five-year program on critical minerals and a peace-building initiative. These details indicate an operational shift toward building local economies and alternatives rooted in regional contexts. The reporting frames these moves as part of a broader rethinking of the foundation’s power and reach, signaling a tactical pivot rather than a change in core values [1].
3. Money matters — financial scale and funding approach clarified
OSF’s financial posture includes historically large disbursements: the foundation reported a budget of over $1 billion in 2020 and total expenditures exceeding $23 billion since 1993, figures used to illustrate the scale of its global grantmaking. Beyond headline totals, the foundation emphasizes unrestricted, long-term support to strengthen civil-society capacity and to sustain human-rights ecosystems over time. These fiscal claims are used to justify both global reach and sustained influence in civic and political arenas [2].
4. How OSF frames its role — “political philanthropy” and defending defenders
OSF leaders and reporting articulate a role not limited to grantmaking but as active political philanthropy: funding strategic efforts to shift power dynamics, protect human-rights defenders, and sustain independent institutions. The foundation describes support mechanisms such as network grants that aim to bolster key parts of the human-rights ecosystem rather than only project-by-project funding. This framing signals an intent to shape systemic conditions rather than only address isolated issues, according to recent statements and coverage [1].
5. What’s contested or missing — access limits and reporting gaps
Several sources note access restrictions or unavailable content in public reporting, including an Error 451 and sign-up barriers that limit independent verification of some program details. Such gaps mean external observers must rely heavily on published OSF statements and a limited set of recent reporting for program specifics. The presence of geographically restricted pages and sign-up walls highlights where transparency could be improved for critics and researchers seeking a fuller accounting [3] [4].
6. Multiple viewpoints and potential agendas — why descriptions vary
Descriptions of OSF alternate between philanthropic-development language and political-activism framing; both appear in the materials. OSF presents itself as defender of rights and builder of civic capacity, while critics often characterize its activities as politically motivated. Recent reporting reflects the foundation’s own language about reimagining its reach, while noting debates over the limits of philanthropic power. Readers should note these contrasting framings when assessing claims about intent and impact [1].
7. Bottom line — what we can reliably conclude from the available public record
From the provided sources, it is clear that OSF’s primary goals are to advance human rights, justice, and democratic principles, expand support for independent media and public health, and increasingly to address structural inequality through strategic, long-term funding. Recent public documents and reporting add that OSF has reoriented resources toward the Global South, launched targeted programs in Africa, and explicitly positions itself as a political philanthropist with a focus on sustaining human-rights ecosystems [2] [1].