Goyim epstein

Checked on February 3, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The phrase “goyim in abundance” appears in newly publicized emails between Jeffrey Epstein and entertainment publicist Peggy Siegal, where Siegal asked if a dinner would be “100% JEW NIGHT?” and Epstein replied “No, goyim in abundance—jpmorgan execs brilliant wasps,” language reported across multiple outlets after the Department of Justice release [1] [2] [3]. Reporting frames the exchange as evidence of casual, exclusionary in-group talk among Epstein’s circle; the documents show both the phrase and wider conversations in the files that invoke Jews, non‑Jews and conspiratorial themes, but the released materials are heavily curated and heavily redacted [4] [5].

1. What the phrase literally is and where it appears

The two-line exchange is documented in the DOJ tranche of Epstein-related emails and reproduced by outlets that examined the files: Peggy Siegal’s August 2010 question “Is it going to be 100% JEW NIGHT?” and Jeffrey Epstein’s reply mentioning “goyim in abundance—jpmorgan execs brilliant wasps,” with “goyim” used in the emails as a colloquial Hebrew/Yiddish term for non‑Jews [1] [2] [3] [5].

2. How reporting has interpreted that exchange

News outlets and commentators have treated the line as emblematic of an elite, exclusionary culture and selected it as a shorthand for the broader revelations in the Epstein files; several pieces place that exchange alongside other emails in the release that reference Jews, eugenic language and conspiratorial claims about Jewish influence in markets [4] [6] [3].

3. Voices named in the exchange and their public responses

Peggy Siegal is named in the released correspondence and has previously said she didn’t know about Epstein’s abuse allegations and that she stopped accepting travel money from him after his 2010 probation ended, a defense she gave as context when the connection resurfaced in 2019 reporting [1]. Media coverage has highlighted Siegal’s role in circulating invitations and in the August 2010 back‑and‑forth reproduced in the files [1] [2].

4. What the emails show beyond a single phrase

The tranche contains multiple communications where Epstein and associates discuss markets, power, race and religion; one 2008 email to Roger Schank reportedly contains language like “how the Jew make money” and “let the goyim deal in the real world,” which reporting cites as evidence of Epstein’s recurring stereotyping in private exchanges [5]. Other summaries from the release describe discussions invoking theories about Jewish influence, eugenics, and “WASP girls,” indicating a pattern rather than an isolated utterance [4].

5. Contrasting readings and potential agendas in coverage

Interpretations diverge: some outlets portray the language as proof of antisemitic conspiratorial thinking among Epstein’s circle, while others frame it as crude insider banter that illuminates elite social dynamics rather than an organized ideology; alternative takes also appear in reporting that links such conversations to broader allegations—some observers suggest the files corroborate fringier claims about networks, while mainstream outlets urge caution because context is limited and selective excerpts can mislead [3] [4] [6].

6. Limits of the public record and unanswered questions

The released materials are extensive but not complete and are heavily redacted in places; available reporting reproduces specific lines and summarizes themes, but cannot fully reconstruct tone, audience or the full conversation threads around every excerpt—therefore claims about intent, organized conspiracy or the extent to which these lines influenced behavior go beyond what the provided reporting establishes [4] [3].

7. Bottom line: what “goyim Epstein” tells us

The phrase “goyim in abundance” as published in the DOJ emails is a plainly documented line that fits into a larger corpus of Epstein communications where Jews, non‑Jews and power are discussed in demeaning or conspiratorial terms; reporting supports treating it as evidence of casual bigotry and elitist in‑group talk among Epstein’s contacts while also acknowledging that selected excerpts and editorial framing shape public perception and that the full context remains incomplete in the released files [1] [5] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What other explicit antisemitic phrases appear in the DOJ release of Epstein emails and where are they documented?
How have different media outlets framed the Epstein files—contrasting sensationalist summaries with cautious legal reporting?
What has Peggy Siegal publicly said about her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and how have outlets verified those statements?