Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Are Groypers secretly pro-lgbt

Checked on September 18, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The claim that Groypers are secretly pro-LGBT is not supported by the available information from various sources [1] [2] [3]. All analyses suggest that the Groypers hold anti-LGBTQ+ views, with some sources describing them as a far-right, white nationalist group involved in controversies and linked to extremist groups [1]. The term "Groyper" is associated with a movement led by Nick Fuentes, which holds virulently antisemitic, racist, and homophobic views [3]. The available information indicates that the Groypers are not pro-LGBT, but rather hold views that are contrary to LGBTQ+ rights [4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources provide context about the Groypers' involvement in online radicalization and their possible connections to violent incidents, such as the assassination of Charlie Kirk [4] [5]. However, none of the analyses provide evidence to support the claim that Groypers are secretly pro-LGBT [2] [6]. Alternative viewpoints, such as the idea that the Groypers might be hiding their true views behind ironic jokes or strategic use of Christian nationalism, are mentioned in some sources [2] [6]. It is essential to consider the potential for misinformation or disinformation when evaluating the claims made about the Groypers [1].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement that Groypers are secretly pro-LGBT appears to be misinformation, as all available analyses suggest that the group holds anti-LGBTQ+ views [1] [3]. This framing may benefit individuals or groups seeking to downplay or obscure the extremist nature of the Groypers [4]. It is crucial to rely on credible sources and fact-based information when assessing the views and actions of groups like the Groypers [1] [3]. The potential for bias in the original statement highlights the importance of verifying information through multiple sources [2] [6] [1] [3] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the official stance of the Groypers movement on LGBT issues?
How do Groypers reconcile their conservative ideology with pro-LGBT sentiments?
Which prominent Groyper figures have expressed support for LGBT rights?
What role do Groypers play in the intersection of conservative and LGBT communities?
How do critics of the Groypers movement respond to allegations of pro-LGBT leanings?