Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is the history behind Tunnel to Towers Foundation?
Executive Summary
The Tunnel to Towers Foundation was created by the family of FDNY firefighter Stephen Gerard Siller after his death on September 11, 2001, and has since focused on supporting first responders, military veterans, and Gold Star families through programs such as mortgage-free homes and specially adapted “smart homes” for catastrophically injured veterans. The charity, operating as the Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation and registered as a 501(c)[1], markets large public events like the Tunnel to Towers 5K and reports substantial fundraising and programmatic impact, while also attracting scrutiny over financial allocations and public claims; these tensions shape how different observers assess its record [2] [3] [4].
1. How a Brother’s Last Run Became a National Charity: origin story that resonates
The foundation’s origin is rooted in a specific, dramatic narrative: Stephen Siller, a 34‑year‑old New York City firefighter, ran through the Battery (Tunnel) toward the World Trade Center carrying gear and lost his life on 9/11, and his family created the charity to honor that sacrifice and continue his ethos of service. The organization’s founders deliberately built programming and annual rituals — especially the Tunnel to Towers 5K that retraces Siller’s route — to memorialize the act and turn grief into a sustained giving engine, linking public remembrance to fundraising and direct service to families and veterans. This narrative is central to the foundation’s identity and its public appeal, and it underpins the charity’s stated mission and branding [5] [6] [3].
2. What the foundation says it does: mortgage relief, homes, and veteran housing ambitions
Tunnel to Towers presents a suite of concrete programs: paying off mortgages for Gold Star and fallen first responder families, building mortgage‑free homes and specially adapted “smart homes” for severely injured veterans and first responders, and running national fundraising and awareness events. The foundation has publicly reported large cumulative totals raised and awarded, and frames its work as both memorial and practical assistance aimed at eradicating veteran homelessness and easing financial burdens on survivors. Program claims emphasize direct, tangible benefits—mortgage elimination and accessible housing—which are easy for the public to understand and for donors to support [7] [8] [9].
3. Financial profile and outside evaluations: strong ratings, some controversy
Independent charity evaluators and public profiles have highlighted the foundation’s high program‑spending ratios and low overhead, with some sources noting top grades (for example an “A+” rating cited by CharityWatch) and reporting that a high share of cash expenses go to programs. At the same time, other summaries note that the foundation has faced criticism about allocation of funds and public transparency, and that public discourse includes debate over how much fundraising dollars support broad branding and events versus direct services. These dual perspectives create a mixed public picture: strong program metrics on paper but persistent questions from critics and watchdogs about priorities and allocation [4] [2].
4. Scale and reach: national events, public visibility, and measurable impact claims
Tunnel to Towers has expanded beyond a local memorial into a national presence through an international 5K in dozens of cities, large‑scale fundraising campaigns, and high‑profile announcements of completed homes for veterans and families. The foundation cites substantial cumulative fundraising totals and the number of homes built or mortgages paid off, presenting measurable outputs as evidence of impact. Supporters point to these tangible deliverables — completed adaptive residences and mortgage relief funds — as proof the model translates donations into real benefits, while analysts caution that output counts do not automatically equate to optimal resource allocation across the broader ecosystem of veteran and first‑responder services [3] [8].
5. Different interpretations and the omitted context donors should know
Observers who praise Tunnel to Towers emphasize the emotional power of its origin story, the visible, singularly named projects that donors can point to, and favorable efficiency ratings; critics emphasize the need for deeper financial transparency, comparative analysis with peer organizations serving veterans and first responders, and clearer disclosure of fundraising costs and long‑term outcomes. Both views are founded on verifiable facts: the foundation’s origin, its registered nonprofit status, its program descriptions, and external ratings are documented, while critiques focus on areas where more granular reporting or independent audits would strengthen public trust. Potential donors should weigh the charity’s expressive memorial mission against empirical comparisons of cost‑effectiveness in veteran and survivor services [2] [4] [5].