How did Jill Biden and Joe Biden first meet and how did their relationship begin?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Joe Biden and Jill Biden first met in March 1975 on a blind date arranged by Joe’s brother, when Joe was a U.S. senator and Jill was a college senior; their courtship quickly deepened into a long-term partnership that led to marriage in 1977 [1] [2]. Over the years their relationship has been retold in memoirs, interviews and official timelines, but it has also been the target of false social-media claims that misstate the timeline and their ages when they met [3] [4].
1. How the blind date happened: a brother’s introduction and a Saturday phone call
According to the Bidens’ own accounts and official timelines, Joe’s brother Frank got Jill’s number and called Joe, who rang Jill on a Saturday in March 1975 to ask her out; Jill later recalled telling the man she had another date but agreed to consider breaking it, and the blind date proceeded as arranged [1] [3]. Contemporary profiles and relationship timelines repeat that origin story — a single, unremarkable setup that led to a first night out in 1975 and is the consistent anchor for later recollections [5] [6].
2. The context: ages, circumstances and the 1972 tragedy
When they met, Joe Biden was in his early 30s and serving in the Senate, and Jill Biden was in her early 20s completing college at the University of Delaware; the meeting came roughly three years after Joe’s first wife, Neilia, and their infant daughter were killed in a car crash, leaving him a single father to sons Beau and Hunter [4] [7] [8]. Reporting and biographical summaries emphasize that Jill was a young adult beginning her career, not a teenager, and that Joe’s status as a widower and parent shaped both his choices and Jill’s hesitations about commitment [4] [9].
3. How the relationship developed: quick intimacy, family care, and mutual support
Nearly from the start the couple moved from dating into family life: Jill began helping care for Beau and Hunter — making dinners, picking up the boys and spending evenings with them — and both have described the relationship as deepening quickly into a partnership that incorporated Joe’s sons as a central concern [8] [3]. Memoirs and interviews published over the years describe a courtship in which marriage was discussed and deferred at times, with both partners recounting that the early phase was “easier” because marriage was not immediately on the table while Jill built her career [3].
4. From proposals to marriage: five proposals and a 1977 wedding
Multiple accounts, including pieces that quote Jill and Joe and contemporary timelines, report that Joe proposed to Jill several times — commonly cited as five proposals — before they married on June 17, 1977, at the United Nations Chapel in New York; the couple later had a daughter, Ashley, in 1981 [3] [5] [2]. That sequence — courtship in 1975, proposals over time, marriage in 1977 — is the narrative consistently presented in profiles, timelines and the Bidens’ own public remembrances [5] [6].
5. Misinformation and contested claims: what has been debunked and what remains disputed
Since their rise to national prominence, some social-media posts have falsely claimed Jill was a teenage babysitter when she met Joe or that their relationship began while Joe’s first wife was hospitalized; fact-checkers at Reuters and AP and spokespeople for Jill have repeatedly debunked those claims and affirmed the 1975 meeting when Jill was in her twenties [1] [4] [10]. There are, however, fringe assertions — such as a claim in a book excerpt referenced on Wikipedia — that seek to rewrite the timeline or imply earlier intimacy; the Bidens’ camp has called those claims fictitious and promotional, and major reporting treats the 1975 blind-date origin as the established account [10].
6. Why the origin story matters: public narrative, private choices, and political framing
The way the meeting and early years are narrated matters politically and culturally because the facts intersect with questions about age, consent and family tragedy; mainstream outlets, biographical sources and the Bidens themselves frame the story as a late-1970s courtship between consenting adults that evolved into a long marriage and public partnership, while misinformation campaigns have tried to recast it for partisan effect [4] [8] [1]. Reporting and archival timelines — from news features and memoirs to encyclopedic entries — converge on the same essentials but also show how disputed claims can linger in public conversation when amplified online [5] [2].