Immigrants do jobs that Americans won't
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Immigrants are demonstrably filling large and growing gaps in the U.S. labor force—especially in agriculture, construction, health care, and caregiving—because the domestic supply of workers has not kept pace with demand and demographic change, not merely because Americans “won’t” do certain tasks [1] [2] [3]. Evidence shows immigrant inflows have eased tight labor markets and moderated wage pressures in affected industries while policy frictions (visa rules, program costs) and local labor-market dynamics shape which jobs immigrants supply [4] [5].
1. The empirical bottom line: immigrants fill measurable shortages
Multiple federal and independent analyses find foreign-born workers account for a sizable and rising share of the U.S. workforce—about 19.2 percent in recent data—and they concentrate in industries with persistent worker shortfalls like farming, construction, and long-term care [6] [2] [3]. State-level research from the San Francisco Fed and others shows slowed immigrant inflows tightened local labor markets between 2017 and 2021, raising the vacancy-to-unemployed ratio and indicating immigrants were substituting for missing native-born mobility [1] [7].
2. “Jobs Americans won’t do” is an oversimplification of supply, wages, and demographics
Framing the question as willingness alone obscures structural facts: an aging native-born population, stagnant participation rates for some cohorts, and declining interstate migration have reduced the domestic labor supply—so many roles are unfilled at prevailing wages and conditions, not simply unwanted [7] [8]. Research and industry reporting find immigrant labor increases firm growth and fills service-sector demand without broad negative wage impacts for natives, suggesting the problem is shortage rather than a stubborn refusal by American workers [7] [9].
3. Sectoral snapshots: where immigrants are concentrated
Agriculture and food production rely heavily on foreign-born labor and face major shortfalls—estimates point to hundreds of thousands of missing workers in construction and farm labor—while immigrants make up substantial shares of nurses, health aides, and other care workers [2] [3] [8]. These concentrations reflect both skill mismatches and the seasonal, mobile, or low-pay nature of many positions that the current domestic workforce has not replenished at scale [3] [5].
4. Policy and market frictions determine how and whether immigrants can fill gaps
Even when employers need workers, the existing visa channels (like H‑2A for farmworkers) are often described as cumbersome and costly, pushing farms and firms toward undocumented hiring or production cuts rather than smoothly replacing labor [5]. Think tanks and economists argue that orderly legal immigration could more effectively relieve shortages and support growth, but political and administrative constraints limit that solution [8] [1].
5. Wages, displacement, and the contested effects on native workers
Evidence is mixed but leans toward immigrants easing shortages without broadly displacing native workers or causing large wage declines; some Fed analyses find immigrant inflows cooled wage growth in sectors with big immigrant gains, which can help control inflation but also fuels political resistance [4] [10]. Leading labor economists and policy groups caution that impacts vary by locality, skill level, and timing, so claims that immigrants simply take “undesirable” jobs or suppress wages universally are inaccurate [11] [9].
6. Reading the motives: whose narratives benefit from simplicity
Advocacy groups on both sides have incentives to simplify: business and pro-immigration researchers emphasize shortages and productivity gains to argue for more legal avenues [8] [12], while opponents often frame immigration as job competition to mobilize political support—both reduce a complex labor-market dynamic to easy slogans. The published evidence supports the pragmatic middle: immigrants help fill roles that the domestic supply currently cannot, but policy design and wages matter for outcomes [7] [4].