How are Indigenous communities and governments responding to new discoveries at former residential school sites?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Indigenous communities have responded to new discoveries at former residential school sites with a mix of grief-driven memorialization, community-led investigations, demands for accountability, and efforts to protect and control those sites—responses that both revive long-standing trauma and catalyze political and legal action [1] [2]. Governments and institutions have reacted unevenly: some gestures of contrition and funding for settlements and commemoration exist, but Indigenous leaders and scholars warn that resources, respect for Indigenous-led processes, and full institutional accountability remain insufficient [3] [2].
1. Community grief, public mourning and contested paths to healing
Across affected nations, families and survivors have organized vigils, placed personal offerings like flowers and moccasins at school sites, and framed discoveries as the reopening of painful wounds that had long been anticipated but not fully acknowledged by wider society [4] [1]. Indigenous writers and scholars emphasize that communities are not monolithic in how they respond—some demand immediate action and public acknowledgment, while others prioritize private, culturally specific grieving and healing practices—and warn that impulsive public reactions (including property destruction) can deepen divisions rather than produce long-term solutions [5].
2. Indigenous-led investigation and use of new technologies
Many nations have turned to ground-penetrating radar and other methods to locate unmarked graves and to corroborate oral histories; experts and chiefs have said it is only a matter of time before such technology reveals more physical evidence at former school sites, and nations are leading or directing those searches to ensure cultural protocols are followed [2] [6]. That Indigenous leadership over investigation reflects a broader insistence that search, identification, and commemoration be governed by survivors and families rather than imposed by external authorities, both to protect dignity and to align procedures with Indigenous legal and spiritual practices [2].
3. Demands for protection, memorialization and historical recognition
Indigenous leaders and advocates are calling for formal protections of former residential school sites and for processes to commemorate victims, with some urging federal and local governments to remove barriers—financial, legal and bureaucratic—that impede identification and commemoration work [2] [7]. Institutions such as Parks Canada have begun designating the residential school system as a National Historic Event and engaging with survivors and communities on plaques and markers, reflecting one strand of government-led recognition even as activists press for deeper reparative measures [7].
4. Government, church and legal responses: gestures, settlements and limits
Federal governments have provided some legal and financial redress—most prominently multi-billion-dollar settlements and trusts intended to fund healing, education and commemoration—but public outrage at discoveries has also reignited debates over institutional responsibility and the adequacy of apologies, particularly from churches implicated in running the schools; political leaders have expressed shock and called for action, while Indigenous ministers and commentators have characterized institutional silence or reluctance to apologize as shameful [3] [8]. Commentary in media and academia highlights that symbolic moves—lowering flags or issuing statements—do not substitute for resources, full access to records, or Indigenous control of processes [2] [8].
5. Longer-term priorities: truth, prevention of further harm, and centered Indigenous agency
Scholars and public-health reviews stress that the residential school system caused intergenerational trauma that continues to affect health and social outcomes, which frames community calls for long-term, culturally appropriate health and social services tied to commemoration efforts [9] [10]. Indigenous communities and some ally organizations are asking non-Indigenous actors to do more than witness: to remove barriers to searches, support local-led healing programs, pressure religious institutions for records and apologies, and fund language and cultural revitalization as part of reparative work—requests that proponents say remain only partially met by current government and institutional responses [8] [2]. Available reporting does not provide a complete inventory of which governments or churches have fully complied with these demands, so assessment of compliance gaps must rely on ongoing reporting and Indigenous leadership updates [2] [8].