Is life getting worse
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Public sentiment and expert judgment are split on whether “life is getting worse.” A 2025 survey of U.S. voters found 60% saying life in the U.S. is getting worse [1], while a Pew panel of experts reported 47% expecting life to be “mostly worse” by 2025 versus 39% who expected it to be better [2]. Journalistic and economic coverage stresses a gap between objective indicators and subjective experience — “windchill” effects make life feel worse than many metrics show [3].
1. People say life is worse — large polls back that up
Public polling captures a clear negative mood: the Data for Progress survey reports a 60% majority of U.S. voters saying life is getting worse and only 20% saying it’s getting better [1]. That pessimism is uneven across political and demographic groups; for example, the survey notes different impressions among 2024 voters and gender splits within Trump voters [1]. The headline figure is consistent with broader narratives that many Americans feel conditions are declining.
2. Experts are pessimistic but divided
A broad group of 915 experts — innovators, policy leaders and researchers — told Pew that 47% expect life to be mostly worse in 2025 compared with pre‑pandemic conditions, while 39% expect it to be mostly better [2]. The expert responses underline that technological change, remote work and other pandemic‑era shifts create winners and losers; some experts foresee benefits from telemedicine and telework, others foresee job loss and social harms [2].
3. Why subjective experience can diverge from objective indicators
Economic reporting describes a “windchill” economy in which people feel worse off even as some aggregate indicators improve: CNN explains that many workers are receiving raises that outpace inflation, yet popular perceptions remain negative — “it feels worse than it actually is” [3]. This framing helps explain how surveys can show deep pessimism even when certain measured outcomes are stable or improving [3].
4. Technology and the “new normal” — double‑edged effects
Pew’s expert commentary highlights technology as a central driver: tele‑everything increases convenience and access for many, but experts warn it will accelerate inequalities, displace jobs, and exacerbate lifestyle‑related health problems in some regions [2] [4]. Voices from lower‑resource contexts express that technological shifts may leave the uneducated and rural populations worse off, reflecting geographic and socioeconomic divergence [4].
5. Cultural narratives amplify a sense of decline
Online communities and commentary — from Hacker News threads to op‑eds — articulate a cultural story that technology and political friction are failing to deliver broad improvements, contributing to collective malaise [5]. That narrative feeds into polls and opinion pieces and is reinforced by media attention to crises and geopolitical tensions, making life feel more precarious than some objective measures suggest [5] [6].
6. Data limitations and what reporting does not say
Available sources do not present comprehensive objective indicators (mortality, GDP growth, poverty rates) side‑by‑side with sentiment in a way that would let us determine whether life is objectively worse overall; reporting instead emphasizes perceptions, expert forecasts, and selective trends (not found in current reporting). The Pew expert panel and voter survey capture expectations and feelings but do not settle the empirical question of aggregate well‑being [2] [1].
7. Competing interpretations — pessimism can be rational or emotionally driven
One interpretation: public pessimism is a rational response to visible risks — job dislocation from technology, underfunded public services and geopolitical tension highlighted by experts [2] [4]. Alternative interpretation: much of the pessimism reflects a “windchill” effect where media focus on hardship and social comparison make conditions feel worse than measurable improvements would indicate [3].
8. What to watch next
Watch both subjective mood and hard measures: subsequent national surveys of well‑being and expert forecasts, plus objective metrics like employment, wages net of inflation, health outcomes and access to services. Sources cited here reveal that opinion and expert judgment matter for politics and policy even if they do not alone prove an objective decline [1] [2] [3].
Limitations: this analysis relies only on the provided reporting and polls; specific empirical trend data are not included in these sources, so claims about objective trajectories beyond what these reports state are not made [1] [2] [3].