Is Lisa noelle voldeng a real person
Executive summary
Lisa Noelle Voldeng is a real, identifiable online publisher: she operates at least one active Substack publication titled Outlaws of Chivalry and a Substack profile under the name Lisa Noelle Voldeng, and she has posted and commented publicly there [1] [2] [3]. What remains contested is the truth and provenance of the explosive audio files she released — journalists and fact‑checkers note the allegations in those recordings are unverified and disputed [4] [5].
1. A public Substack presence establishes an online identity
Multiple sources point to an active Substack account in the name Lisa Noelle Voldeng: a Substack profile and the Outlaws of Chivalry publication carry her byline and branding, and the profile contains public posts and comments attributable to that account [1] [2] [3]. News outlets that covered the viral audio explicitly identify the recordings as having been published via Voldeng’s Substack feed, meaning there is a traceable digital footprint linking the name to online publishing activity [6] [7] [8].
2. Claims she made about the tape releases are on the public record
Reporting shows Voldeng has asserted that she conducted phone interviews with a man identified as Sascha (Sascha) Riley and that she possesses original, unedited audio files from interviews conducted in July 2025; mainstream summaries of the story repeat that those are her claims [8]. Several news outlets and aggregators note that the tapes were shared from her Substack account and that she stated copies were shared with law enforcement and trusted contacts, though those representations are attributed to her rather than independently corroborated [4] [8].
3. Major caveats: the recordings and core allegations remain unverified
Every outlet that has distilled the story emphasizes a basic, salient fact: the allegations contained in the recordings — which name high‑profile figures and assert extreme crimes — have not been independently corroborated and have not been confirmed by courts or mainstream investigative bodies [4] [6]. Independent commentators and investigative writers have expressed skepticism about the underlying narrative and about how little verifiable evidence has been produced alongside the audio, and at least one longform critique argues the account may be incorrect while acknowledging both parties have not been proven liars [5].
4. Skepticism, verification efforts, and the media ecosystem
Journalists, legal observers, and social‑media commenters are publicly calling for verification rather than amplification; those calls have been documented on platforms where researchers and reporters discuss the need for time‑consuming corroboration before treating the tapes as established fact [9]. At the same time, the existence of a Substack author does not, by itself, validate extraordinary allegations — the reporting landscape shows a clear split between acknowledging Voldeng as a real publisher and treating the content she released as unproven [1] [4].
5. Final assessment: real person, contested claims
The preponderance of available reporting supports a straightforward conclusion about identity: Lisa Noelle Voldeng is a real, public Substack author with posted content and a profile traceable online [1] [2] [3]. However, the more consequential question — whether the audio she released proves the criminal allegations it contains — remains unresolved and is explicitly disputed or unverified by mainstream outlets and independent commentators [4] [5]. Reporting to date documents her role as publisher and claimant while also documenting widespread demands for independent verification.