Israel reports the highest rape rate per capita in the Middle East, around 15.5 per 100,000
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Reports and commentators say Israel’s recorded rape rate is about 15.5 per 100,000, which some outlets describe as the highest in West Asia or the Middle East [1]. Domestic advocacy groups and crisis centers place much higher lifetime and annual victimization figures — for example, ARCCI cites estimates like “one in five women raped” and “84,000 women assaulted each year” — but those come from surveys and organizational tallies rather than standardized international police-report comparisons [2] [3].
1. What the “15.5 per 100,000” figure actually is
The 15.5 per 100,000 number appears in reporting that cites an ARCCI or related analysis, which frames Israel’s recorded rape rate as 15.5 per 100,000 and compares it to neighboring states to conclude Israel now has the highest per‑capita rate in West Asia [1]. That figure is presented in media and secondary outlets; the original dataset or methodology behind the 15.5 figure is not reproduced in the provided snippets, so available sources do not detail how it was calculated or which year it represents [1].
2. Two different types of measures: recorded rate vs. survey prevalence
International ranking sites and police-stat-based tables list annual recorded rapes per 100,000 [4] [5]. By contrast, Israeli advocacy and research groups publish lifetime-prevalence or survey estimates — for example, ARCCI and earlier academic studies reporting that roughly 18–33% of respondents experienced sexual assault in their lifetime and claims like “one in five women is raped” [2] [3]. These two measurement approaches are not interchangeable: recorded rates reflect complaints or police records; prevalence figures reflect self-reported victimization in surveys and often capture much more hidden violence [2] [4].
3. Why international comparisons are fraught
Comparing per‑capita rape rates between countries is unreliable without standardization. Definitions of rape, counting rules (e.g., whether gang rapes count multiple incidents), reporting rates, and policing practices vary widely; Sweden’s famously high reported rate is regularly explained by its broader legal definition and more frequent reporting, not by straightforward higher incidence [4] [5]. WorldPopulationReview and Wikipedia both caution that national definitions and recording practices create large distortions in cross‑country tables [4] [5].
4. What Israeli sources emphasize about scale and underreporting
Israeli crisis centers and researchers emphasize that large shares of sexual violence go unreported and that many victims are minors; ARCCI materials say only about six percent of sexual assaults are reported to authorities (citing a 2014 index), and that most assaults are committed by someone known to the victim [2]. More recent ARCCI-related press reporting cites tens of thousands of complaints received by centers and high closure rates without indictment, pointing to systemic problems in the handling of cases [6] [7] [8].
5. Conflicting third‑party rankings and questionable claims
Several third‑party aggregators produce country rankings that often contradict one another because they draw on different sources (UNODC, national police, surveys); for instance, WorldPopulationReview and data aggregators present widely varying country lists of “highest rape rates” and note how sensitive these lists are to definitional differences [4] [9]. Opinion pieces and politically charged commentary have amplified alarming headlines — e.g., claims of “260 Israeli women and minors raped each day” or that Israel is “the global rape capital” — but these are published in outlets with clear editorial agendas and rely on selective or extrapolated figures rather than a single verifiable international dataset [10] [11].
6. What is solidly supported by the provided sources
The sources provided consistently show: (a) Israeli advocacy organizations report high prevalence and large numbers of survivors contacting services [2] [3]; (b) some media/secondary outlets have cited a figure of 15.5 rapes per 100,000 and described it as the highest in West Asia [1]; and (c) major data‑compilation sites caution that cross‑country rape rate comparisons depend on divergent definitions, reporting behavior, and counting rules [4] [5].
7. Caveats, open questions, and where to look next
Available sources do not include the original police or UNODC table that yields the 15.5 number, nor do they show year‑by‑year methodological notes for that figure; therefore, the provenance and comparability of “15.5 per 100,000” are unresolved in current reporting [1]. To assess the claim rigorously, consult: the raw UNODC or national police statistics for the relevant year, the ARCCI annual report with methodology, and metadata on how other countries define and record rape (not found in current reporting).
In short: the 15.5/100,000 headline circulates in reporting and advocacy, but it sits alongside much larger survey‑based prevalence claims and a well‑known international problem of inconsistent definitions and underreporting. The sources supplied document both the domestic crisis framing by Israeli crisis centers and the analytical warning that cross‑country rape‑rate rankings can mislead [2] [1] [4] [5].