How have Julie Green’s specific prophecies fared against real-world events since 2020?
Executive summary
Julie Green has publicly issued high-profile political and spiritual prophecies since 2020 — including claims that the 2020 U.S. election would be "corrected" and that "Babylon has fallen" — and those pronouncements have become focal points of both support and criticism within online prophetic communities [1] [2]. Available reporting compiled from her ministry site and commentary sites shows clear statements of prediction and sharp disagreement about whether those predictions have been fulfilled, but no independent, authoritative record of fulfillment is presented in the supplied sources [2] [3] [4].
1. What she actually prophesied: clear, political, and public
Julie Green’s ministry publishes explicit prophecies on its site and media channels; among the most consequential for public debate is a prophecy asserting that “2020 will be corrected,” that decertification would pass in the majority of states, and that the truth of a Trump victory would be revealed — language summarized by a prophecy index entry and present in her recorded material [1]. Her official prophecies also carry apocalyptic and spiritual framing — phrases like “Babylon has fallen” appear on her prophecy page, signaling broad cultural and institutional overthrow as part of the message she released to followers [2]. The ministry’s media page makes clear the prophecies are posted publicly and warns that many social accounts purporting to be her are not official, underscoring both the reach and the management challenges of disseminating those claims [3].
2. How followers and promoters present outcomes: conviction, interpretive flexibility
Supporters within her circles treat prophecies as authoritative and sometimes retrofit events into prophetic timelines; discussions on forums and sympathetic sites show adherents arguing that prophecies are being fulfilled or are in process and that skeptics simply lack spiritual sight [5] [4]. Defenders featured in the cited commentary accuse critics of producing “fraudulent” hit pieces and of misunderstanding prophetic timing or spiritual nuance, indicating that within pro-Green communities non-fulfillment claims are often contested or dismissed as unfair [4].
3. How critics characterize her track record: accusations of missed predictions
Critics and some commentators argue Green has made inaccurate pronouncements and point to prophecies that, in their view, have failed to materialize; one source explicitly frames an article as alleging that she has issued prophecies that “have failed to be fulfilled,” and other online observers describe some of her prophecies as “a little crazy,” reflecting skepticism about literal fulfillment [4] [5]. The supplied reporting shows these critiques exist and are vocally expressed in both forum and ministry-adjacent coverage, but those sources do not present an exhaustive audit that independently verifies each prophecy against events [5] [4].
4. What is missing from the public record supplied here: no neutral fulfillment audit
The documents and pages provided establish what Green prophesied and that supporters and detractors vigorously contest her accuracy, but they do not include an independent, item-by-item tracking or adjudication of her prophecies against verifiable, contemporaneous events; the ministry materials catalog prophecies and media, and commentary sites offer opinion and rebuttal, but no source here supplies a neutral fulfillment ledger [3] [2] [4].
5. Bottom line: disputed claims, partisan battleground, and unanswered verification
Based on the reporting given, Julie Green’s prophecies since 2020 are on record and politically consequential in how they were framed, supporters assert fulfillment or spiritual timing, critics assert missed predictions, and an impartial, comprehensive verification of outcomes is not present in the provided sources — leaving the question of exact “success” unresolved in neutral terms [1] [4] [5] [3]. Those seeking a determinate assessment must look for a methodical, independent audit that lists each prophecy, the promised timeframe and conditions, and objective evidence tied to the outcome, material not included in the reporting cited here.