What specific prophecies has Julie Green made and which were later proven false or accurate?
Executive summary
Julie Green has issued a string of high-profile political prophecies from the platform of Julie Green Ministries — including that Donald Trump would be found “innocent,” that the United States would see an “overthrow” putting a righteous government in place, and sensational claims about world leaders such as that the “real Joe Biden is dead” and Prince Charles would murder the queen — all documented on media platforms and reported by multiple outlets [1] [2] [3] [4]. The clearest, documentable mismatch between prophecy and outcome in mainstream reporting is the prediction of a not-guilty verdict for Trump, which came into direct contrast with the guilty verdict and subsequent public response to Green’s defense of her word [2]; other prophecies remain publicly recorded but either unfulfilled in observable fact or disputed, based on the sources available.
1. What she said about Donald Trump — a definitive, documented prophecy and its immediate refutation by events
Julie Green told followers on a livestream that Donald Trump would be found “innocent,” a prophecy picked up and amplified on conservative platforms and then widely circulated and critiqued when the hush-money trial resulted in a guilty verdict; outlets such as Newsweek recorded the original prediction and reported that Green doubled down afterward to explain why she still saw her prophecy as correct even after the courtroom outcome [2]. That sequence — an explicit prediction tied to a specific legal outcome, followed by a public guilty verdict — is the clearest case where a named prophetic claim and a verifiable court decision came into sharp contradiction in the contemporaneous reporting [2].
2. Predictions of an “overthrow” or “reinstatement” of power — grand political forecasting with political context
Multiple outlets report that Green prophesied a dramatic “overthrow” or “reinstatement” that would move power from the “wicked” to the “righteous,” language she has repeated in sermons and videos and which has been highlighted by critics and supporters alike; Times of India and Newsweek summarized these apocalyptic-political messages and placed them in the context of Green’s appearances at ReAwaken America–style events and ties to MAGA figures [4] [2]. As of the sourced reporting, that sweeping political transformation had not occurred in any observable, verifiable form; the reporting records the prophecy and the social-media reaction but does not document fulfillment [4] [2].
3. Claims about Biden, Obama and royals — sensational assertions recorded but not substantiated in mainstream coverage
Rolling Stone catalogued a set of more extraordinary claims Green has made, including that the “real Joe Biden is dead” and that Barack Obama controls a Biden body double, and reported a past prophecy that Prince Charles would murder Queen Elizabeth — statements that propelled her into a wider media spotlight and into political circles such as Doug Mastriano’s events [3]. The Rolling Stone profile and related reporting present these as Green’s recorded pronouncements; the sources document the existence of the prophecies and the public reaction, not independent verification that such events occurred as described [3].
4. How supporters and critics frame outcomes and accountability
Followers and friendly outlets sometimes argue Green has had prophecies that “came to pass,” while critics and media analysts point to high-profile misses and to pattern-matching rhetoric as evidence the prophetic claims are politically motivated or inaccurate; Newsweek and Times of India note the publicity cycle and mockery that followed failures or unmet expectations, and MarketFaith and other evaluative sites debate her track record and whether unfulfilled predictions disqualify her as a “true prophet” [2] [4] [5]. The sources show competing narratives: Green’s ministry presents ongoing prophetic content on its own pages and Rumble channel, while mainstream outlets highlight specific failed predictions or implausible claims and social-media critics amplify those failures [1] [6] [7] [2].
5. What can be concluded from the public record in these sources
From the available reporting, the single most verifiable mismatch is Green’s prediction of a not-guilty Trump verdict versus the recorded guilty verdict and her subsequent reinterpretation of the prophecy [2]; other high-profile prophecies are well-documented as having been made (overthrow of government, Biden/Obama/body-double claims, royal murder claim) but lack independent evidence of fulfillment in the sources provided and remain a matter of public dispute and political interpretation [3] [4] [1]. The ministry’s own archives and channel list additional dated prophecies, but the reporting assembled here does not offer a comprehensive adjudication of each one’s truth claims, only that several specific prophetic statements are on record and that at least one major prediction was contradicted by a verifiable event [6] [7] [2].