Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: What false claims did Kirk make about trans people

Checked on September 18, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided suggest that Charlie Kirk made several false claims about trans people, including being an outspoken opponent of gender-affirming surgeries for minors [1] and transgender athletes competing in women's sports [1]. Additionally, Kirk's history of spreading hateful conspiracy theories and misinformation [2] has been highlighted, which put many in the trans community at risk. The LGBTQ+ Democratic Caucus has also denounced Kirk's anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric, stating that his words fueled harassment, threats, and fear for queer and transgender people [3]. It is also worth noting that Kirk falsely linked a transgender paralegal to his shooting [4], and the claim was amplified by social media and some prominent accounts.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources do not directly address the false claims made by Kirk about trans people [5] [6], instead focusing on the public reaction to his death and the concern that digital hate could spill into real-world violence. However, other sources provide more specific information about Kirk's claims, such as his opposition to gender-affirming surgeries for minors [1] and transgender athletes competing in women's sports [1]. The retraction of a claim by The Wall Street Journal regarding the ammunition used in the Charlie Kirk shooting [7] also highlights the risks of rushing to publish breaking news and the potential for misinformation. Furthermore, the fact that a trans Seattleite was falsely identified as the shooter [8] and faced threatening anti-trans rhetoric, despite providing evidence that she was not involved in the shooting, is a crucial aspect of the story that should not be overlooked.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement asks about the false claims Kirk made about trans people, but does not provide any context or information about Kirk's history or the impact of his claims [1] [2] [3]. This lack of context could potentially lead to misinformation or bias, as it does not consider the complexity of the issue or the potential harm caused by Kirk's claims. The sources that highlight Kirk's hateful conspiracy theories and misinformation [2] and the harassment, threats, and fear faced by the trans community [3] suggest that Kirk's claims were not only false but also harmful and dangerous. The fact that some sources do not directly address the false claims made by Kirk about trans people [5] [6] could also be seen as a potential bias, as it does not provide a complete picture of the issue. Overall, it is crucial to consider multiple sources and viewpoints when assessing the false claims made by Kirk about trans people [1] [2] [3] [5] [6] [4] [7] [8].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the most common myths about trans people debunked by science?
How have Kirk's statements impacted the trans community?
What organizations have spoken out against Kirk's transphobic claims?
What are the consequences of spreading misinformation about trans people?
How can allies support the trans community against false claims?