Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Kirk said stoning of homosexuals

Checked on September 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The claim that Charlie Kirk said stoning of homosexuals is not supported by the majority of the analyses provided [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. However, it is mentioned that Charlie Kirk cited a Biblical verse that says 'thou shall lay with another man, shall be stoned to death' and described it as 'God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters' [1] [7]. Additionally, Stephen King apologized for falsely accusing Charlie Kirk of advocating for the stoning of gay people [7] [8]. The original statement appears to be an oversimplification or misrepresentation of Charlie Kirk's actual statements and views.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key piece of missing context is the distinction between Charlie Kirk's personal views and his public statements. While some analyses mention his opposition to same-sex marriage and gender care for transgender people [2], others highlight the potential for his rhetoric to incite violence [3]. Alternative viewpoints include the perspectives of Charlie Kirk's supporters, who may view his statements as a legitimate expression of his religious beliefs, as well as the perspectives of LGBTQ+ individuals and organizations, who may view his statements as hateful and discriminatory [3]. Furthermore, the historical and cultural context of the Biblical verse cited by Charlie Kirk is not fully explored in the analyses [1] [7].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement "Kirk said stoning of homosexuals" may be considered misleading or inaccurate [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. This framing benefits those who seek to criticize or discredit Charlie Kirk, as it presents his views in a particularly extreme and negative light. On the other hand, Charlie Kirk's supporters may benefit from a more nuanced understanding of his statements and views, which could help to contextualize his comments and mitigate criticism [7] [8]. Ultimately, a balanced and informed assessment of Charlie Kirk's statements and views requires careful consideration of multiple sources and perspectives [1] [7] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [8].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the biblical references to stoning used by Kirk?
How did Kirk's statement impact LGBTQ+ rights advocacy?
What was the public reaction to Kirk's comments on homosexuality?
Has Kirk apologized or clarified his stance on LGBTQ+ issues?
What are the implications of Kirk's views on stoning for human rights?