Which cities in the US have the largest Somali communities and why did they grow there?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The largest Somali communities in the United States are concentrated in the Minneapolis–Saint Paul Twin Cities area of Minnesota, with major secondary hubs in Columbus, Ohio, and the Seattle–Tacoma area of Washington; smaller but notable concentrations appear in Maine (Lewiston and Portland), parts of California and the Washington, D.C. metro, and other cities [1] [2] [3] [4]. Their growth reflects a mix of 1990s refugee flows from Somalia, formal refugee-resettlement placements, secondary migration driven by family and economic opportunity, and local policies and support networks that encouraged clustering [5] [6] [2].
1. Where the largest Somali populations live today — an unsettled count
Minnesota — especially the Twin Cities — is widely reported as home to the largest Somali population in the U.S., with estimates ranging from tens of thousands to community claims as high as ~80,000; official demographers and multiple outlets report figures in the tens of thousands and note most Somalis in Minnesota live in the metro area [1] [2] [7]. Columbus, Ohio, is consistently cited as another principal hub—some sources place it second with estimates ranging into the tens of thousands and claim explosive growth since the 1990s [3] [8] [9]. The Seattle–Tacoma region (including cities such as Kent) and other West Coast communities are commonly listed as a third major cluster [9] [10]. Several data aggregators and local reports produce differing city-by-city rankings — for example ZipAtlas and Neilsberg list Columbus at or near the top while state and nonprofit reporting highlight Minnesota as the largest single-state center — underscoring variation in sources and methodology [11] [9] [1].
2. Why the Twin Cities grew into 'Little Mogadishu'
The Twin Cities’ Somali growth traces to refugee arrivals after Somalia’s civil war in the early 1990s and to secondary migration from initial U.S. resettlement sites; Minnesota received both formal refugee placements and later waves joining existing family and community networks, with local nonprofits, mosques and civic leaders providing ESL, job assistance and other supports that reinforced settlement there [2] [5] [6]. Journalistic and civic sources note that Minneapolis neighborhoods such as Cedar-Riverside became cultural and commercial anchors — attracting Somali-owned businesses, institutions and political engagement — while local government and community organizations cultivated a relatively welcoming environment that promoted family reunification and long-term settlement [1] [2] [5].
3. Economic pull and secondary migration: Columbus, Seattle and beyond
Columbus and parts of Ohio drew Somalis for job opportunities, lower housing costs and existing social networks, producing large Somali neighborhoods on the city’s northeast and west sides that host halal markets, businesses and community institutions [8] [4]. The Seattle area and other West Coast cities attracted both earlier migrants and later arrivals looking for employment in regional economies and for community ties already established through earlier migrations to the Pacific Northwest [9] [10]. Social networks and the practical advantages of joining established communities — from cultural familiarity to remittance channels — drove many families to move after initial placements in other cities [6].
4. Smaller but intense concentrations and why they matter
Maine’s Lewiston and Portland are repeatedly cited as having one of the highest per-capita Somali concentrations in the U.S., a pattern created by targeted resettlement and subsequent family migration that produced dense, visible communities in smaller cities [3] [4]. These concentrated populations, even when smaller than metro hubs, reshape local economies and politics and have produced elected Somali representatives in multiple jurisdictions, signaling civic incorporation across scales of city and state [4] [2].
5. Data caveats, competing narratives and the role of policy
Estimates vary considerably depending on source — U.S. Census/ACS self‑identification, local demographer estimates, refugee agency tallies and private aggregators yield different city ranks and totals — so claims that one city “definitively” has the largest Somali community should be read against methodological differences and the strong role of secondary migration [9] [11] [2]. Federal refugee policy, local resettlement decisions, the availability of jobs and housing, and the existence of community organizations and political allies have all shaped where Somalis settled and why those places grew [6] [1].