Lisa noelle voldeng
Executive summary
Lisa Noelle Voldeng is a Canadian Substack writer who in January 2026 published audio and testimony attributed to a man identified as Sasha (or Sascha) Riley, thrusting her into the center of a contentious online debate about unverified Epstein‑related allegations [1] [2] [3]. Her Substack outlets—most prominently “Outlaws of Chivalry”—hosted the material and Voldeng has said she interviewed Riley and alerted various allies and authorities, while mainstream verification of the tapes and many claims remains absent [4] [2] [5].
1. Who she says she is and where she publishes
Voldeng presents herself as a prolific Substack creator behind multiple newsletters including “Outlaws of Chivalry” and “Ultra‑Future,” and her public Substack profiles and About pages list projects tied to the name Lisa Noelle Voldeng and an imprint called Ultra‑Agent Industries Inc. [1] [4] [6]. Public information aggregated by outlets also lists her location as Vancouver Island, Canada, which is echoed across several profiles and articles about her [5] [7] [2].
2. The Sasha/Sascha Riley recordings and Voldeng’s role
The audio testimony circulating online was published via Voldeng’s Substack account and she has stated that the recordings were produced from phone interviews she conducted with the man identified as Sascha Riley between July 19 and July 24, 2025, according to reporting summarizing her account [8] [3] [2]. Multiple news outlets note that the tapes were “shared from the Substack account of one Lisa Noelle Voldeng,” making her the public conduit for the material [5] [9].
3. What Voldeng claims she did after interviewing Riley
Voldeng has written that after interviewing Riley she “selectively contacted allies, church, police, and government officials in various countries, with a call to warn,” and she alleges Riley was moved out of the United States “to safety” after an FBI contact in summer 2025, assertions reported by several outlets summarizing her Substack posts [5] [7] [2]. Those are her claims as published; independent confirmation of those events is not contained in the reporting provided here [5] [7].
4. Verification, skepticism and the wider reaction
News organizations and online communities covering the recordings emphasize that the tapes and the allegations they contain have not been authenticated by courts or mainstream investigations, and the material is described repeatedly as “unverified” in the reporting [9] [3]. The leak sparked intense debate across forums and social media—some users treating the testimony as critical new evidence while others flagged concerns about credibility, sourcing and the ethics of publishing explosive material without independent corroboration [10] [2].
5. Signals about her editorial posture and prior commentary
Archive captures and posts attributed to Voldeng show combative, graphic rhetoric and a focus on exposing alleged abuse networks, which contextualizes why she would publish such testimony and why some readers amplify her work while others question her methods and motives [11] [4]. Given her platform’s stated mission—“ultramissives from Lisa Noelle Voldeng and friends, from the frontiers of honour”—her editorial stance appears activist and adversarial rather than neutral reporting, a posture noted across her Substack pages and third‑party summaries [4] [6].
6. What is known, and what remains unsettled
It is established that Lisa Noelle Voldeng runs visible Substack publications, hosted the Riley audio, and has publicly framed her actions as investigative and protective, including claims of notifying officials and relocating the purported survivor; these facts are documented in the sources provided [1] [5] [2]. What remains unsettled in the available reporting is independent authentication of the tapes, verification of Riley’s account by institutions or courts, and external corroboration of Voldeng’s claims about involving law enforcement and moving Riley, and the sources here do not provide those confirmations [9] [3].