Have local police or city officials commented on the prayers happening on streets?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting in the provided sources does not show a clear, direct statement from local police or city officials specifically about “prayers happening on streets” in a general sense; instead the materials include an incident-focused claim about U.K. police allegedly investigating a woman for silent prayer (WorldNetDaily) and local police community engagement at a mosque (Harrow Online) that references officers attending public religious gatherings [1] [2]. Other items in the dataset are devotional/prayer resources and routine police briefs that do not address public street prayers [3] [4] [5].
1. What the reporting actually says: an allegation of policing prayer vs. community outreach
One item in the results is a WorldNetDaily story asserting that a woman in the West Midlands has been repeatedly investigated or arrested for silently praying on a public street and quotes her saying police told her “prayer is an offense” [1]. That claim is discrete and accusatory about enforcement of conduct related to prayer. By contrast, a Harrow Online piece describes police officers engaging with worshippers at Harrow Mosque and joining a women’s safety walk addressing anti‑social behaviour and street safety — an account of outreach and partnership rather than criminalising worship in public spaces [2].
2. No direct city- or police-department press statement on street prayers in these sources
None of the provided search results contain an official press release, quoted spokesperson, or municipal statement explicitly addressing the legality or policy toward people praying on public streets. The WND article quotes a complainant’s claim about police words and actions but does not show a formal police statement in the excerpted snippets; the Harrow Online item reports officers’ community activity but not an overarching policy pronouncement about public prayer [1] [2]. Available sources do not mention an explicit city- or police-issued position on street prayers.
3. Two competing narratives are present; neither is fully corroborated here
The dataset presents competing impressions: one narrative frames police as policing private religious expression in public [1]; the other shows police building ties with faith communities and addressing safety concerns [2]. The sources do not reconcile these accounts or provide independent confirmation such as body‑cam footage, court records, or an official statement from the police force involved. That gap matters for assessing whether the WND-depicted incidents reflect policy, isolated enforcement actions, or a miscommunication.
4. Broader materials in the results are devotional, not investigative
Several provided sources are prayers, devotionals, or materials encouraging prayer for police and public servants [3] [6] [7] [8]. These pieces illustrate public religious interest in law enforcement but do not substitute for reporting on law‑enforcement policy or actions toward people praying in public [3] [7].
5. Key limitations and what’s missing from this snapshot
The search set lacks an official statement from the West Midlands Police or another municipal authority, independent local news corroboration of the alleged investigations, legal filings, or quotes from civil‑liberties groups that would confirm or contest the WND account [1]. It also lacks a formal policy text on public prayer or the public‑space ordinances that could determine whether any enforcement would be lawful. Available sources do not mention such documents.
6. How to interpret the discrepancy and next reporting steps
Given the opposing impressions, readers should treat the allegation of policing silent prayer as an uncorroborated claim in this dataset and see the Harrow Online piece as evidence police sometimes engage constructively with worship communities [1] [2]. To move from competing claims to verified fact, seek: (a) an official statement or press release from the relevant police force; (b) local independent reporting or court records regarding the alleged investigations; and (c) any municipal code provisions on obstruction, protest, or public‑order offences that might have been invoked. Those items are not present in the current search results.
Sources cited in this piece: WorldNetDaily on alleged investigations [1] and Harrow Online on police engagement at Harrow Mosque [2]. Other listed items are devotional or routine police briefs and do not address official positions on street prayer [3] [4] [5] [7] [8].