What are the gun control laws in Japan and how do they contribute to low gun violence rates?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Japan’s Firearm and Sword Possession Control Law (1958, amended repeatedly) effectively prohibits most private ownership of handguns and tightly restricts rifles/shotguns to hunting and sport; licensing requires classroom training, exams, background checks, storage rules and frequent renewals (licenses commonly expire every three years) [1] [2] [3]. The result: gun ownership and gun-related deaths are extremely low — Japan typically records single‑digit gun deaths per year and G7‑lowest gun‑death rates such as 0.03 per 100,000 in some reports [4] [5] [6].
1. How the law frames civilian access — a near‑prohibition, with narrow exceptions
Japan’s basic rule is prohibition: “No person shall possess firearms… except under certain specified circumstances,” and civilians are largely barred from handguns; private possession is generally limited to hunting and shooting sports under strict licensing regimes [7] [8] [9]. The law also restricts manufacture, sale and importation, limits the number of gun shops, and even controls cartridge purchase and disposal in some prefectures [10] [11].
2. The licensing treadmill — training, testing, background checks, storage
Prospective owners must complete mandatory safety training, pass written and practical shooting tests (often high accuracy thresholds), undergo background checks that include interviews and mental‑health or drug screening, and demonstrate secure storage (gun lockers); licenses are time‑limited and must be renewed — often every three years — repeating large parts of the process [2] [3] [12].
3. Enforcement, records and police powers
Police maintain firearms registers at prefectural and national levels and can inspect storage; law and practice grant broad powers to search and confiscate when suspicion arises, with heavy penalties for violations and tight controls on pistol parts and imitation guns [13] [14] [10].
4. Measured outcomes — strikingly few shootings, but not zero
Multiple sources document Japan’s very low gun‑death totals (single digits or low double digits annually) and extremely low per‑capita rates compared to other wealthy nations: examples include nine firearm deaths in 2018, single‑figure annual gun deaths in many years, and G7‑lowest figures such as 0.03 per 100,000 cited by the BBC and others [4] [5] [6]. High‑profile exceptions — notably the 2022 assassination of former PM Shinzo Abe using homemade firearms — underscore that strict laws reduce but do not eliminate all gun incidents [15] [16].
5. How the laws plausibly reduce gun violence — mechanisms identified in reporting
Reporting links legal barriers to low availability: very few civilians own guns (Small Arms Survey and other estimates show ownership rates far below Western peers), limited supply and heavy licensing cut off easy access for would‑be shooters, curtail mass‑shooting potential and reduce impulsive firearm homicides and suicides [5] [17] [12]. Administrative controls — storage rules, registries, cartridge tracking and few retail outlets — further raise transaction costs and detect illicit flows [13] [11].
6. Alternative explanations and scholarly debate
Analysts and scholars caution that law alone isn’t the whole story. Some research and commentary emphasize cultural factors (collectivism, deference to authority, social norms), strong policing and broader social controls as major contributors to low crime — arguing correlation but debating causation [2] [8] [18]. Academic and policy sources present both views: gun laws materially reduce access (many news outlets and policy sites argue this) while other studies point to policing practices and cultural context as essential co‑factors [4] [18].
7. Limitations of available reporting and data gaps
Available sources document the law, procedures and low death counts, but they do not provide a randomized causal estimate isolating law from culture, policing or socioeconomic factors; nor do these sources quantify illegal guns’ prevalence precisely (some reporting cites smuggling and a small black market, but magnitudes vary) [1] [19]. Claims that culture alone explains the low rates appear in some critiques, but available reporting does not settle the causal split [2] [18].
8. What this means for policy debates abroad
Japan’s system demonstrates that a mix of legal restriction, onerous licensing, monitoring and social acceptance can produce very low firearm mortality; journalists and analysts consistently note Japan’s laws as a model for reducing availability, while also warning that transplanting Japan’s approach would confront different constitutional, cultural and policing realities in other countries [16] [8] [4].
Sources cited above document Japan’s law and its outcomes; where no source directly addresses a question, available sources do not mention it.