Has Tucker Carlson been sued over alleged antisemitic remarks, and what were the outcomes?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Tucker Carlson has been the subject of litigation tied to allegations of a workplace culture that included antisemitism, most notably in a lawsuit filed by former Fox News producer Abby Grossberg that named Carlson as a defendant; that dispute ultimately produced a multi‑million dollar settlement with Fox News, and has been cited as a proximate factor in Carlson’s ouster from the network [1] [2] [3]. Beyond that employment litigation, Carlson has been widely accused in media and by Jewish organizations of promoting antisemitic tropes through his commentary and guest choices — allegations he denies — but the public record provided here shows no separate, successful civil verdict holding Carlson personally liable for antisemitic speech distinct from the Grossberg/Fox matter [4] [5] [6].
1. The Grossberg lawsuit: the concrete legal claim that named Carlson
In March 2023 Abby Grossberg, a Jewish producer who worked on Carlson’s primetime program, filed a suit alleging that senior staff on Carlson’s show made antisemitic comments to Jewish employees and pressured her to provide deceptive testimony in unrelated litigation; the complaint explicitly listed Carlson as a defendant in that workplace suit [1]. Fox News later settled with Grossberg — media reporting cites a reported $12 million settlement with Grossberg — and the litigation and related discovery were part of the cascade of legal and reputational problems that culminated in Carlson’s departure from Fox in April 2023, a decision the Anti‑Defamation League publicly welcomed [2] [3].
2. Outcomes tied to that litigation: settlement, internal fallout, and Carlson’s exit
The direct legal outcome available in the reporting is the settlement with Grossberg by Fox News; reporting connects that suit and other legal exposures — including the Dominion defamation litigation against Fox that produced internal discovery of Carlson’s texts — to corporate decisions that ended Carlson’s tenure at Fox [2] [3]. The settlement resolved the producer’s claims against the company; public reporting does not show a separate jury verdict or judicial finding that Carlson personally was liable for antisemitic remarks in a standalone defamation or hate‑speech judgment in the sources provided [1] [2].
3. Broader accusations, public condemnation and reputational consequences
Independent of litigation, Carlson’s programming and public statements have drawn sustained condemnation from Jewish organizations and commentators: major groups publicly denounced his depiction of President Volodymyr Zelensky with dehumanizing language; the ADL and others criticized his promotion of “replacement” themes and his platforming of figures with overt antisemitic histories, and commentators have documented repeated use of tropes associated with antisemitism in his coverage of George Soros, Israel and Jewish public figures [5] [3] [6]. Those reactions produced reputational and institutional pushback — including later fractures among conservative institutions over whether to defend or distance themselves from Carlson after he hosted extremist figures — but these are essentially political and social consequences rather than judicial findings [7] [8].
4. Carlson’s response and competing interpretations
Carlson has publicly denied being antisemitic, telling interviewers he is “anti‑Nazi” and characterizing his work as truth‑telling rather than hate speech; his defenders argue his critiques target policy or power rather than Jews as a group [4] [6]. Critics counter that repeated rhetorical patterns — comparing Jewish figures to rats, amplifying replacement rhetoric, and platforming extremist guests — amount to coded or explicit antisemitism and that mainstreaming such ideas has real‑world harms; academic and Jewish communal analyses cited here document those patterns [6] [1].
5. What is proven in court and what remains public debate
Based on the reporting assembled, the provable legal result is a workplace discrimination/related settlement involving Fox News and a former producer who alleged antisemitism tied to Carlson’s show, with Carlson named in filings; that settlement and discovery materially affected Carlson’s career at Fox [1] [2] [3]. What is not documented in these sources is a separate, successful civil ruling or criminal conviction that holds Carlson personally liable solely for making antisemitic public remarks — the debate about whether his public speech crosses the legal line or is protected political commentary remains contested in public forums and among commentators [1] [4].