Has Meir Ben-Shitrit become a "star" in the israelis society?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Meir Ben-Shitrit has, in multiple outlets' accounts, moved from anonymous suspect to a visible media figure embraced by parts of Israeli right‑wing media and public opinion, winning televised platforms, standing ovations and explicit political backing [1] [2] [3]. That prominence is real but contested: critics inside and outside Israel treat his media treatment as proof of moral collapse and have denounced the lionization, while polls and protests cited by reporters show significant portions of the Israeli public oppose prosecuting the accused soldiers [4] [3].
1. How “star” is defined — media celebrity vs. social consensus
Calling someone a “star” can mean repeated prime‑time appearances, public fanfare and symbolic elevation by political figures rather than unanimous social admiration; the evidence gathered by several outlets shows Ben‑Shitrit has received all three kinds of boosts — on Channel 14 broadcasts, masked then unmasked social‑media videos, and public applause from audiences and political allies — which fits a functional definition of a media star in contemporary Israeli politics [1] [3] [2].
2. Documented media appearances and public unveiling
Reporting traces a clear arc: initial masked television interviews followed by Ben‑Shitrit revealing his identity and posting a video unmasking himself and speaking directly to Israelis, moves that turned a suspect into a recognizable public figure and were amplified by right‑leaning broadcasters [1] [3]. Press TV and Raseef22 describe Channel 14 treating him like a celebrity with studio applause and offers of support, signaling the transformation from accused to media personality in at least some broadcast ecosystems [2] [3].
3. Political endorsement and why it matters
Prominent political actors and commentators publicly defended the detained soldiers and criticized the investigations, a dynamic Raseef22 and Mondoweiss link to political legitimation of Ben‑Shitrit and co‑accused, contributing to a sense of celebrity built on political protection rather than neutral acclaim [3] [1]. That partisan elevation explains how a criminal suspect can be cast as a “hero” in certain circles even as others decry the move.
4. Public reaction: polarized, not universal adulation
While several reports emphasize a groundswell of sympathy and polls suggesting many Jewish Israelis oppose prosecutions related to the Sde Teiman case, those same reports also document domestic and international outrage and vigorous criticism from human‑rights quarters — indicating that Ben‑Shitrit’s “stardom” is intense in some segments but strongly rejected in others [4] [1].
5. The framing and the source agendas
Sources used to describe Ben‑Shitrit as a “media darling” are largely critical outlets (Mondoweiss, Raseef22) and international broadcasters with particular geopolitical stances (Press TV); their emphasis is on how Israeli institutions and media normalize abuses, which shapes the narrative that he has been lionized [1] [3] [2]. That critique is corroborated by on‑the‑record phenomena — TV appearances, applause, political comments — but readers should note the outlets’ explicit editorial perspectives when weighing interpretations [2] [1].
6. What cannot be confidently asserted from available reporting
The materials assembled demonstrate clear instances of media promotion and political defense that amount to celebrity within right‑wing media ecosystems, and cite polls showing broad opposition to prosecution [1] [4], but they do not provide a comprehensive cross‑societal measurement of fame across all Israeli demographics or quantify how long this attention will persist; mainstream Israeli outlets or representative longitudinal polling that might nuance the claim further are not present in the provided set [1] [4].
Conclusion — a qualified yes
On the balance of available reporting, Meir Ben‑Shitrit has become a “star” within specific Israeli media and political circles — receiving prime‑time airtime, public adulation from some audiences and explicit political defense — even as that “stardom” is fiercely contested and condemned by others, making his celebrity both real and deeply polarizing [1] [3] [2] [4].