Which organizations coordinated the nationwide protests after Renée Good’s death and how are they funded?
Executive summary
A national coalition calling itself “ICE Out For Good” — led publicly by progressive groups including Indivisible, MoveOn Civic Action, the American Civil Liberties Union, Public Citizen, Voto Latino, United We Dream and allied local organizations — coordinated a weekend of protest actions after the killing of Renée Nicole Good, with organizers reporting roughly 1,000 events nationwide [1][2]. Reporting shows clear organizational coordination and broad participation, but the available sources do not substantiate a centralized funding stream that paid for those protests; some outlets allege far‑left funding ties while mainstream coverage focuses on mobilization rather than specific backers [3][4][5].
1. Who publicly coordinated the nationwide actions
A formal coalition calling the mobilization “ICE Out For Good” was announced by Public Citizen and listed Indivisible, MoveOn Civic Action, the American Civil Liberties Union, Public Citizen, Voto Latino, United We Dream, the National Day Laborer Organizing Network and other partner groups as principal coordinators of the weekend of action [1], a claim echoed in national reporting that credited Indivisible as a key organizer for the “ICE Out For Good Weekend of Action” that produced more than 1,000 planned events [2][6]. Local chapters and independent groups — from Democratic Socialists of America locals to the Party for Socialism and Liberation in several cities — also organized city‑level marches and vigils, demonstrating a mixed model of national coordination plus distributed local organizing [5][7].
2. Scope, mechanics and visible leadership on the ground
News outlets documented a dense schedule of vigils and marches across major cities — Minneapolis, New York, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston and many more — with some events planned directly under the ICE Out For Good banner and others organized by local chapters or allied organizations such as Indivisible affiliates and community groups [2][5][7]. Coverage describes both centrally advertised actions and decentralized turnouts: organizers issued calls to “grieve, honor, and demand accountability,” while local groups tailored tactics and venues, resulting in simultaneous national and grassroots dynamics [1][2].
3. What the reporting says about who paid for the protests
The reporting in this packet splits sharply: several outlets that amplified a New York Post‑aligned line alleged that “far‑left” groups and Indivisible affiliates were behind funding for protests and suggested links to philanthropic sources such as Open Society Foundations [3][4]. By contrast, mainstream coverage and the coalition’s own announcement emphasize organizing capacity and mobilization rather than identifying a single funding source; Public Citizen’s press release lists coalition partners and event logistics but does not disclose a unified funding vehicle for the actions [1][2][5]. In short, allegations of centralized funding appear in some partisan reporting, while coalition communications and independent reporting document coordination without naming a common funder [3][4][1].
4. Limits of the record: what is and isn’t shown by the sources
None of the provided mainstream reports or the coalition announcement supplies documentary evidence — grants, bank transfers, vendor invoices — tying a specific foundation or donor to the cost of organizing the nationwide weekend of action, and the coalition materials focus on partner lists and event coordination rather than finances [1][2]. The only explicit funding claims in the packet come from outlets relaying New York Post lines that invoke large philanthropic donors; those claims are reported as allegations and are not corroborated here with primary financial records or statements from the named funders [3][4].
5. Assessment: coordination confirmed, funding disputed and politically freighted
The evidence is clear that a broad, named coalition organized and amplified the national days of protest — Indivisible and civil‑liberties groups played leading public roles and local affiliates executed events on the ground — but the question of who “funded” the protests lacks verifiable confirmation in these sources, leaving room for competing narratives; partisan outlets frame the story as funded by “far‑left” interests while coalition statements and mainstream reporting emphasize grassroots mobilization and coalition logistics without detailing finances [1][2][3]. Readers should treat assertions of major foundation funding as alleged in certain outlets and look for primary documentation (tax filings, grant announcements, vendor receipts) before accepting claims of a centralized funding stream [3][4][1].