Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What was Paolo Zampolli's role in introducing Jeffrey Epstein to Prince Andrew?

Checked on August 20, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the provided analyses, none of the sources directly address Paolo Zampolli's role in introducing Jeffrey Epstein to Prince Andrew. The analyses consistently show that the available sources do not contain information about this specific connection.

However, the sources do establish several key facts about Paolo Zampolli:

  • He is a modeling agent who introduced Donald Trump to Melania Trump at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998 [1] [2] [3] [4]
  • He first spotted Melania in Milan in 1995 and later introduced her to Trump at New York's Kit Kat Club in 1998 [2]
  • Politico reported that Zampolli was connected to Epstein and his now-detained co-conspirator and ex-girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell [5]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal significant gaps in available information regarding the specific question asked:

  • No direct evidence of Zampolli facilitating an introduction between Epstein and Prince Andrew appears in any of the analyzed sources
  • The sources focus primarily on Zampolli's role in introducing the Trumps, not his potential connections to the Epstein-Prince Andrew relationship
  • While one source mentions Zampolli's connections to both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell [5], it provides no details about the nature of these connections or any role in royal introductions

The missing context includes:

  • Timeline of when Epstein and Prince Andrew first met
  • Whether Zampolli had any documented relationship with Prince Andrew
  • The specific nature of Zampolli's connections to the Epstein network beyond the brief Politico reference

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question assumes a factual premise that is not supported by the analyzed sources. By asking "what was Paolo Zampolli's role," the question presupposes that Zampolli definitively played a role in introducing Epstein to Prince Andrew, when the available evidence does not establish this connection.

This type of leading question can perpetuate unsubstantiated claims by treating them as established facts. The question would be more accurate if framed as "Did Paolo Zampolli play a role in introducing Jeffrey Epstein to Prince Andrew?" or "What evidence exists regarding Paolo Zampolli's potential role in introducing Jeffrey Epstein to Prince Andrew?"

The lack of substantive information in the analyzed sources suggests that either this connection doesn't exist, or the specific sources examined don't cover this aspect of the Epstein network's social connections.

Want to dive deeper?
What was the nature of Paolo Zampolli's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?
How did Prince Andrew's association with Jeffrey Epstein impact his public image?
What were the circumstances surrounding Paolo Zampolli's introduction of Jeffrey Epstein to Prince Andrew?
Did Paolo Zampolli have knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged crimes at the time of the introduction?
What has Prince Andrew said about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Paolo Zampolli?