Fact check: What percentage of couples in long-term relationships practice pegging?

1. Why the exact number is missing — researchers never reported pegging prevalence in these pieces

All nine supplied analyses explicitly indicate no prevalence data on pegging; their focus lies on other sexual or relationship dimensions. For example, an article on how long men last in bed evaluates duration by age without addressing specific sexual practices ^[1]. A Gen Z dating-trend piece centered on “Shrekking” likewise fails to touch on anal-play practices between partners ^[2]. A lifestyle story about post-sex habits highlights intimacy challenges and pillow talk but contains no survey figures about pegging ^[3]. The absence across diverse article types demonstrates the claim cannot be supported from the present corpus.

2. Multiple topical angles were covered, yet none connect to pegging — a sign of selective coverage

The dataset spans erotic fetishes, sexual benefits, and relationship communication, showing broad topical coverage that still omits pegging statistics. A report on cuckolding discusses how common that fetish feels to participants but similarly omits data on anal-probing or pegging frequency ^[4]. A health piece cataloguing sex’s benefits likewise contains no behavior prevalence measures ^[5]. Even an organizational sitemap and parenting-education pieces emphasize unrelated themes and lack empirical prevalence data ^{[6] [7]}. The consistent omission across outlets suggests pegging prevalence is either underreported in mainstream coverage or addressed in specialized sexual‑behavior surveys not included here.

3. What the supplied documents do provide — context, not prevalence

Although none give the sought percentage, the combined sample yields contextual insights: mainstream coverage continues to treat specific sexual practices as niche topics or frame them within broader relationship conversations rather than quantitative studies ^{[2] [3] [4]}. Articles emphasize communication, consent, and intimacy habits, which matter for whether couples experiment sexually, but these qualitative angles cannot substitute for prevalence data. The materials show journalists often prioritize anecdote, trend framing, or health messaging over reporting raw behavioral statistics.

4. Why this matters — claims without direct data are unreliable

Using these sources to assert a precise pegging rate would be unsupported and misleading, since none contain the necessary empirical figures. The supplied items would only justify hypotheses—such as that sexual diversity exists and that communication influences experimentation—not numeric prevalence. Given the gap, any definitive percentage cited without reference to dedicated sexual-behavior surveys or peer-reviewed research would lack evidentiary backing and could misrepresent how common the practice is in long-term partnerships.

5. Where the evidence gap likely stems from — methodology and reporting choices

Mainstream outlets rarely conduct or publish large-scale behavioral surveys in-house; they instead report on studies or interviews. The absence of pegging statistics here likely reflects either a lack of accessible, recent population surveys addressing pegging or editorial choices to focus on other sexual topics ^{[1] [4]}. Academic sex-research often appears in specialized journals or institutional reports; without those sources in the dataset, prevalence cannot be inferred. The dataset’s composition—news and lifestyle pieces rather than empirical studies—explains the lacuna.

6. Practical next steps to obtain a trustworthy figure

To determine a reliable percentage, consult representative surveys and peer-reviewed sexual-behavior research that explicitly asks about pegging or anal-play between partners. Suitable sources would include national sex surveys, epidemiological studies, or academic papers using probability sampling and clear operational definitions. Because the provided materials do not include such studies, the percentage remains unknown from this corpus; obtaining an evidence-based estimate requires targeted literature searches beyond the reviewed items.

7. Bottom line for the original statement and responsible reporting

From the supplied sources, one cannot state what percentage of long-term couples practice pegging; asserting a concrete rate would be unsupported by the evidence at hand ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]}. Responsible fact-checking demands either citing a recent, representative survey that directly asks about pegging or acknowledging the absence of data. The present collection consistently documents the lack of such a survey, so the correct factual conclusion is that the claim remains unverified given these materials.