Percentage of Somali on welfare in Minnesota
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The clearest published estimate comes from a Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) analysis that finds roughly 81 percent of Somali-headed households in Minnesota consume some form of means-tested public assistance, with specific program rates of about 54 percent on SNAP (food stamps) and 73 percent with at least one member on Medicaid; households with children are especially likely to receive aid, with CIS reporting nearly 89 percent of Somali households with children on some form of welfare [1]. Independent fact-checking and subsequent coverage have questioned broad public claims that “88%” of Somalis receive welfare, noting the absence of direct evidence from the White House for such sweeping statements even as they reference similar figures from CIS [2].
1. What the headline percentage means and where it comes from
The oft-cited “around 80–88%” figure for Somalis on welfare traces back to Jason Richwine’s CIS analysis of census- and survey-derived household consumption of means-tested programs, which aggregates receipt across SNAP, Medicaid, cash welfare and other benefits to report that about 81 percent of Somali households in Minnesota consume at least one welfare program [1]. Media and political retellings sometimes round that up or reuse a sub-sample (households with children) and thereby amplify numbers—CIS itself reports that nearly every Somali household with children receives some form of welfare [1].
2. What “welfare” includes in these counts
The CIS percentages are not limited to cash welfare but include multiple means-tested programs: SNAP (food stamps), Medicaid enrollment, and cash assistance such as TANF or SSI; the report specifically highlights roughly 54 percent of Somali-headed households on SNAP and 73 percent having at least one member on Medicaid while noting 27 percent of Somali households receive cash welfare in some estimates [1] [3]. Different studies and commentators, however, sometimes conflate program categories or present single-program rates as if they represented total dependency, so careful reading of program definitions is essential [1] [3].
3. Reliability, methodology and competing vetting
CIS’s report uses census and survey-based microdata to estimate program receipt, but critics and neutral observers note limitations: sample sizes for subpopulations, differences between household- and individual-level measures, and the age structure of the Somali community (a high share of children) all affect percentages and comparability to “native” households [1] [4]. FactCheck.org reviewed public claims invoking an “88%” figure and concluded that the administration did not produce independent evidence for that exact number, while also contextualizing fraud investigations—finding alleged fraud totals substantially lower than some political claims [2].
4. Context: poverty, demographics, and the size of the community
High welfare participation among Somali households in Minnesota sits alongside unusually high poverty and a youthful demographic: multiple sources report elevated poverty rates and a large share of minors (one source indicates 44 percent under 18 among Somali Minnesotans), and recent population estimates place roughly 80,000–107,000 people of Somali descent in Minnesota depending on the dataset and year cited [5] [6] [7]. Those structural factors—refugee status, limited English proficiency for many, concentrated poverty—explain why eligibility and receipt of means-tested programs run well above state averages [1] [6].
5. How the numbers are used politically and what to watch for
The welfare statistics have been weaponized across the political spectrum: conservative outlets and opinion pieces frame the figures as fiscal burden and proof of failed integration, sometimes citing inflated fraud figures, while local advocates and community groups emphasize the data’s poverty context and the economic contributions and tax payments of Somali Minnesotans highlighted by other analyses [3] [8] [9]. Readers should note sources’ agendas—CIS is a restrictive-immigration research group whose framing focuses on fiscal impacts [1], while advocacy organizations highlight economic contributions and demographic context [9] [4].
6. Bottom line and remaining data gaps
The best-cited, program-inclusive estimate is that roughly four in five Somali-headed households in Minnesota receive at least one means-tested benefit (about 81 percent according to CIS), with program-level rates like 54 percent on SNAP and 73 percent on Medicaid and even higher rates among households with children [1]. However, interpretation requires caution: program definitions, household composition, sampling limits, and political framing matter; independent verification and disaggregated, up-to-date census or administrative data would improve precision, and that granular administrative breakdown is not provided directly in the sources assembled here [1] [2].