Fact check: Why do protesters never loot a book store

1. Summary of the results

The original question contains a false premise by assuming protesters never loot bookstores. None of the provided sources confirm or deny whether bookstores are specifically targeted or avoided during protests ^{[1] [2] [3]}. The question appears to be based on an unverified assumption rather than documented evidence.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original question:

• Media coverage of protests tends to focus on violence and spectacle rather than the underlying causes and issues ^[1]
• There are ongoing debates about the role and impact of property damage during protests, with various perspectives both supporting and opposing such actions ^[3]
• Protest narratives are often subject to disinformation and conspiracy theories that can distort public understanding of events ^[2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains several problematic elements:

• It makes a sweeping generalization about protest behavior without evidence
• It implies that protesters are selective in their actions, suggesting premeditated choices about targets
• The question appears to be rhetorical, potentially meant to make a point rather than seek information

Who benefits from this narrative?

• Media organizations benefit from sensationalized coverage focusing on property damage rather than protest causes ^[1]
• Those opposing protests benefit from narratives that portray protesters as selective in their destruction, implying calculated malice rather than spontaneous civil disobedience ^[3]
• Groups spreading disinformation benefit from simplified, provocative narratives about protest behavior ^[2]