I hate niggers
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Your phrase is a clear example of hate speech: it uses a racial slur and targets a protected group, which fits definitions used by the UN, UNESCO and major reference works as communicative attacks or pejorative language aimed at people because of race [1] [2] [3]. International organizations warn such language fuels social division and can precede violence; legal definitions and protections vary by jurisdiction but many bodies call for countermeasures short of blanket censorship [4] [5] [6].
1. What the phrase is, by established definitions
Major authorities define “hate speech” as communication that attacks or uses pejorative, discriminatory language toward people based on identity factors such as race or colour; epithets and slurs are repeatedly cited as canonical examples (United Nations, UNESCO, Britannica) [1] [2] [3]. The user’s phrase uses a racial slur and therefore falls squarely within those characterizations [3] [1].
2. Why institutions treat this language as dangerous
International and intergovernmental organizations describe hate speech not merely as offensive but as corrosive to social cohesion and a precursor to harm. The Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance and others say inflammatory rhetoric can undermine democracy and precede hate crimes or mass atrocities; the UN Strategy on Hate Speech stresses links between demeaning language and escalations into discrimination or violence [4] [1].
3. Legal and policy context: protection vs. prohibition
There is no single global legal definition of hate speech and national rules differ. The American Library Association and U.S. jurisprudence emphasize that U.S. law offers broad speech protection under the First Amendment, while other states restrict severe forms of hate speech that amount to incitement to violence or discrimination [6] [1]. International human-rights law requires states to prohibit the most severe forms of incitement to hatred, but many other offensive forms remain protected speech and are addressed through non-legal measures [2] [1].
4. Platform and societal responses commonly used
Because outright criminalization is legally complex and varies by country, organizations and platforms pursue a mix of approaches: content moderation, education, counter-speech and media literacy. UNESCO and the Council of Europe emphasize media and information literacy, platform accountability and awareness-raising as practical responses to limit the spread and impact of hate speech online [7] [8].
5. Competing perspectives and the free-speech tension
Scholars and institutions are divided. Some argue robust protection of offensive speech is essential to democratic debate and caution against censorship; others insist marginalized groups need protection because hate speech compounds existing inequality and harms social equality [3] [6]. International bodies like the UN recommend balancing restrictions on the most dangerous forms of hate speech with protections for freedom of opinion and expression [1].
6. What research and guidance recommend in practice
The UN and UNESCO frame hate speech as a spectrum and recommend targeted measures: prohibit incitement to violence, require platforms to remove clear calls for harm, and invest in education, media literacy and counter-narratives to address root causes—rather than pursuing blunt suppression of all offensive language [1] [2] [7].
7. Limitations and what the sources do not address
Available sources do not mention the user’s intent, context, or whether this phrase was directed at an individual or posted publicly; those facts determine legal and policy consequences and are not found in current reporting (not found in current reporting). Sources here also do not offer a single, universally binding legal standard for all nations—rather, they document a range of definitions and policy choices [5] [1].
8. Bottom line and responsible next steps
Label the phrase accurately: it is a racial slur and fits authoritative definitions of hate speech used by the UN and major reference works [1] [3]. Where you encounter or see this language used publicly, the established responses are removal when it constitutes incitement or targeted threats, counter-speech and education to reduce harm and prevent escalation [2] [7].