Which residential school sites had confirmed unmarked graves in 2021 and how many remains were estimated at each?

Checked on December 7, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

In 2021 community-led ground‑penetrating radar (GPR) searches announced preliminary findings at several former residential school sites: Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc (Kamloops) reported 215 possible unmarked graves (announced May 2021) [1]; Cowessess First Nation announced up to 751 possible unmarked graves at Marieval (June 24, 2021) and later said 300 had been identified from that total [2] [3]; additional communities reported dozens to hundreds of plausible or suspected graves as searches continued, bringing early national tallies into the hundreds and later into the thousands in summaries of ongoing work [4] [5].

1. What was announced in 2021 and by whom

The first high‑profile announcement came from Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc in May 2021, when community leaders reported that GPR had located what they characterized as about 215 possible unmarked graves at the former Kamloops Indian Residential School site [1]. Weeks later, Cowessess First Nation publicly said a preliminary GPR survey at Marieval found up to 751 possible unmarked graves — a figure that community leaders and regional Indigenous organizations cited as the largest single preliminary number at the time [2] [3].

2. Numbers reported and how they were framed

Media and community statements used language that distinguished “possible” or “suspected” unmarked graves detected by GPR from excavated, forensically confirmed human remains; for example, Cowessess and Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc described GPR anomalies as unmarked graves or potential burials based on subsurface signatures [2] [1]. Cowessess’ initial “up to 751” figure and later statements that “300 have now been identified” illustrate the evolving, preliminary nature of GPR-based counts [3].

3. What GPR can and cannot tell us — reporting context

Reporting and expert commentary emphasized that GPR detects ground anomalies consistent with graves but cannot by itself confirm human remains; confirmation requires forensic excavation and other lines of evidence. Some outlets and analysts noted skepticism and caution about treating GPR anomalies as definitive without further investigation [2] [6]. Academic and journalistic reviews in later years document both the limits of GPR and the central role communities played in directing searches [7].

4. Broader pattern across Canada in 2021

After the Kamloops announcement, many First Nations initiated searches of former school sites and cemeteries; results in 2021 and the following months produced dozens more potential gravesites and raised national counts into the hundreds and then thousands as multiple communities reported findings [4] [5]. Provincial and federal funding was mobilized to support community‑led searches, reflecting both the scale of the effort and the political shock that followed the initial 2021 announcements [8].

5. Disagreement and denialist pushback

A minority of commentators and organizations disputed the GPR findings or their interpretation. For example, a Fraser Institute commentary asserted that “no unmarked graves have been discovered at Kamloops or elsewhere” and argued the narrative was exaggerated [6]. Mainstream reporting and later fact‑checks, however, show most outlets couched findings as “possible” or “suspected” graves and many communities continued to report additional plausible burials [7] [5].

6. Subsequent reporting and evolving tallies

By 2022–2024, aggregated reporting from news outlets and government or Indigenous sources described cumulative discoveries of suspected unmarked graves in many communities, with some summaries citing more than 1,100 or more than 2,300 suspected graves identified across sites since spring 2021; those totals reflect numerous community searches and varying methodologies, not forensic confirmation in every case [4] [5].

7. Key limitations in the public record

Available sources make clear that most 2021 announcements were based on GPR and preliminary surveys; many anomalies remain unexcavated and unconfirmed, and estimates shifted as further work proceeded [2] [3]. Sources do not provide a single, definitive list of “confirmed unmarked graves” from 2021 backed by forensic excavation; instead the public record contains community announcements of suspected or possible graves and later aggregated totals [2] [1] [5].

8. Why the distinction matters now

The distinction between GPR‑detected “possible” graves and excavated, forensically confirmed human remains affects legal, cultural and policy responses: communities have prioritized culturally appropriate treatment, memorialization and access to records, while others have used uncertainty to contest the findings [2] [9]. Journalistic records from 2021 onward show both deep community grief and political debate about interpretation and next steps [8] [6].

Sources cited in this piece report the initial 2021 announcements (Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc — 215 possible graves; Cowessess/Marieval — up to 751 possible graves, later saying 300 identified) and describe the broader wave of community GPR searches and evolving national tallies [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Available sources do not mention a consolidated, forensic‑confirmed list of unmarked graves from 2021.

Want to dive deeper?
Which Canadian residential schools had confirmed unmarked graves in 2021 and what were the discovery methods?
How were estimates of remains at 2021 residential school sites calculated and how reliable are they?
What governmental or Indigenous-led investigations followed the 2021 unmarked grave discoveries?
How did news of 2021 unmarked graves at residential schools affect reconciliation and policy in Canada?
Where can I find official lists and reports for each 2021 unmarked grave site and their estimated counts?