Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Who are the armed queens of SLC and what is their ideology?

Checked on October 16, 2025

Executive Summary

Armed Queers Salt Lake City (Armed Queers SLC) is described in the available reporting as a small, activist group formed to combine LGBTQ+ advocacy with armed self‑defense training and broader left‑wing political goals; founder Ermiya Fanaeian is repeatedly identified as the public face of the project [1]. After the September 2025 killing of Charlie Kirk, right‑wing outlets spotlighted the group and alleged links, while the founder has denied any connection and characterized the scrutiny as targeted political attack [2] [3]. Reporting differs on emphasis and motive; the record shows claims, denials, and active scrutiny without definitive public evidence tying the group to the crime [2].

1. Who says what — competing narratives and their stakes

Reporting creates two competing narratives: one frames Armed Queers SLC as a radical leftist collective advocating armed queer self‑defense and systemic change, tracing ideology to trans liberation, prison abolition, anti‑capitalism, and anti‑imperialism [1]. Another narrative, pushed by conservative media after the Kirk shooting, links the group to extremist behavior and suggests possible operational connections to the event, amplifying political pressure and public suspicion [2]. The founder and the group rebut these claims as scapegoating of trans and leftist organizers; the dispute is political as well as factual, and sources reflect those incentives [3].

2. The founder and the organization’s stated mission

Multiple reports identify Ermiya Fanaeian as the founder and organizer; the group is said to have begun with the stated goal of combining LGBTQ+ mutual aid and armed self‑defense training while also endorsing broader abolitionist and anti‑capitalist aims [1]. Fanaeian publicly denies involvement in violent acts and frames the project as community protection and dignity work for trans people; the denial has been repeated in several outlets and is central to the group’s public posture [3]. The founder’s stated positions do not, in the published accounts, provide evidence of criminal activity.

3. The criminal allegation spotlight: what’s asserted and what’s shown

After the high‑profile killing, right‑wing outlets intensified coverage that asserted links between the shooter and Armed Queers SLC; reporting described the group as “under spotlight” and “under scrutiny,” but available items in the record stop short of publishing definitive evidence of operational involvement [2]. Independent reporting notes unanswered questions and ongoing investigation status; the founder’s denial is contemporaneous, and public claims of ties appear contested. The record shows allegation and scrutiny, not verified legal findings tying the organization to the crime [2] [3].

4. How sources frame motive and ideology differently

Left‑leaning contextualization stresses self‑defense, trans liberation, and mutual aid as core ideological drivers, situating Armed Queers SLC within broader activist traditions like Pink Pistols and gun‑rights activism among marginalized communities [1]. Right‑leaning outlets emphasize radical language, alleged ties to foreign influence, and potential threats, framing the organization as a security concern and political adversary [2]. These divergent portrayals reflect distinct media incentives: one emphasizes civil defense for marginalized groups, the other underscores public safety and political culpability.

5. What investigations and public records show so far

The sources indicate the group faced increased attention and reported “FBI scrutiny” in the immediate aftermath of the Killing, but published summaries do not present court filings, indictments, or public agency determinations definitively linking Armed Queers SLC or Fanaeian to the act [4] [2]. The coverage therefore documents investigative attention and allegations, not conclusive legal adjudication. The balance of available reporting shows active contestation between accusation and denial, meaning the public record remains unsettled as of the latest reports cited [3] [4].

6. What’s omitted or needs corroboration before firm conclusions

Key gaps include absence of publicly released forensic or legal documents tying the shooter to the group, limited direct sourcing for alleged operational ties, and potential political motives shaping both accusation and defense. The sources contain overlapping claims but rely on different editorial lines; no single verified primary document is presented in the files provided. To move from competing claims to established fact requires transparent evidence such as indictments, unambiguous communications recovered in investigation, or corroborated witness testimony, none of which appear in the current set of reports [2] [4].

Conclusion: The available reporting presents consistent identification of Armed Queers SLC as a left‑wing, armed self‑defense group founded by Ermiya Fanaeian, and it reflects disputed allegations linking the group to a high‑profile killing alongside forceful denials. The factual record in these sources shows allegations and scrutiny but lacks public legal proof of involvement, so careful distinction between claim, counterclaim, and proven fact remains essential [1] [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the background of the SLC armed queens' founders?
How do the SLC armed queens' views on self-defense intersect with feminist theory?
What role do the SLC armed queens play in the broader gun rights movement in the US?
How have local authorities responded to the SLC armed queens' activities?
What are the SLC armed queens' positions on issues like police reform and community safety?