Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the work requirements for SNAP recipients in 2025?
Executive Summary
The core change for 2025 is that federal SNAP work rules have been restored and expanded, with Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents (ABAWDs) required to show at least 80 hours of work, volunteering, or approved training per month to remain eligible starting implementation in late 2025, and the ABAWD age band has been broadened to include adults roughly between 18 and 64 [1] [2]. Parallelly, the longstanding general SNAP work requirements—registering for work, accepting suitable employment, and participating in employment and training when assigned—continue to apply to able-bodied recipients aged roughly 16–59, with exemptions for disability, caregiving, pregnancy, and other categories [3].
1. The Return of Enforced ABAWD Hours: What Changed and Who’s Affected
Starting in practice on or about November 1, 2025, federal guidance resumed full enforcement of the ABAWD time limit and activity requirement, directing states to require 80 hours per month of work or qualifying activities for ABAWDs to receive SNAP benefits beyond three months in a 36-month period; federal guidance and reporting estimate hundreds of thousands could be impacted [1]. The policy change reasserts the ABAWD framework that had been relaxed previously; states are responsible for tracking compliance and notifying households, and the USDA stated it will temporarily limit accountability for state administrative errors through the initial implementation window [4] [2]. This shift expands the administrative and verification burden on both states and beneficiaries, and the rule applies principally to individuals without dependents unless they meet an exemption.
2. Who Is Exempt and Who Must Comply: The Clauses That Matter
Federal documents and state guidance make clear that several groups remain exempt from ABAWD rules: those with documented physical or mental limitations, pregnant women, caregivers of young children, veterans with qualifying conditions, and individuals meeting other statutory exceptions [3]. States are also directed to consider homelessness and other barriers when assessing exemptions, and some guidance clarifies temporary relief or phased implementation for households during the initial months [4] [3]. Nevertheless, the new or reinterpreted rules widen the ABAWD age range to 18–64 in many implementations, bringing younger and older working-age adults into the compliance net where previously some had been excluded [2] [5].
3. Timing, Notices, and the Administrative Crunch States Predict
Multiple reporting outlets and state bulletins note that the rule’s effective enforcement date in practice is late 2025 and that states received USDA guidance in October 2025 to prepare outreach, eligibility notices, and case management systems [1] [4] [2]. States such as Maryland and Nebraska publicized that federal legislation (H.R. 1) and subsequent USDA direction require them to implement new verification steps and provide impacted households roughly three months to come into compliance, prompting concerns about funding, staffing, and IT upgrades to track monthly hour attestations and exemptions [5] [6]. The federal stance includes some temporary protection against penalties for state errors during rollout, but operational capacity remains a significant variable that will influence how many recipients actually lose benefits.
4. The Numbers and the Stakes: Who Could Lose Access and Why It Matters
Journalistic estimates and USDA summaries converge on an impact range of roughly 700,000 to 900,000 SNAP participants who may face re-enforced ABAWD rules, though exact counts depend on state waivers, exemption determinations, and administrative execution [1]. The policy’s reinstatement of time limits ties benefit continuation to monthly activity verification; failure to meet or verify 80 hours a month can trigger loss of benefits after the three-month allowance. Given SNAP’s role in household food security, the reinstated enforcement carries substantial implications for food access, state social service workloads, and local labor markets where job availability, transportation, and childcare constraints affect recipients’ ability to meet the hourly threshold [2] [3].
5. Competing Interpretations, Political Context, and What to Watch Next
Coverage and state guidance reflect divergent framings: federal and some state officials present the change as restoring long-standing work expectations and encouraging labor market participation, while advocacy groups and some state agencies warn about administrative strain and potential harm to food security for vulnerable households [2] [5] [1]. The legal and policy posture hinges on H.R. 1 implementation details, USDA rulemaking and guidance documents, and state-level decisions on outreach and exemptions; observers should watch state notifications to households, appeals processes, and early termination statistics, because initial months will reveal whether projected impact estimates materialize or are mitigated by waivers, exemptions, or implementation delays [4] [3].
Sources: See government guidance and state notices summarized above [3] [7] [5] [1] [4] [2] [6].