What percentage of Somalia Americans are on welfare
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting does not show a reliable national percentage of Somali Americans on welfare; advocates say “most Somalis are not on welfare” [1], while some critics point to concentrated poverty and state-level fraud cases in Minnesota that have been described as large in scale but do not translate to an 88% welfare rate [2] [3] [4]. National estimates cited in partisan outlets vary widely and often conflate poverty, program participation, and fraud findings [3] [5].
1. The claim: “88% of Somalis are on welfare” — where it came from and what reporting shows
The “88%” figure surfaced in a presidential remark that said “the welfare is like 88% or something” and was repeated in several news accounts of his remarks [6] [2]. FactCheck.org examined the comment and found the White House did not supply evidence for that specific 88% claim; reporting instead focuses on separate issues such as fraud investigations and program use, not a verified nationwide welfare participation rate for people of Somali descent [2].
2. National data vs. local anecdotes: why a single percentage is misleading
National surveys that would measure benefit receipt by ancestry groups — such as the American Community Survey — can be limited for small ancestry populations and often do not support a single, nationwide percentage for “Somali Americans.” Advocacy material explicitly counters the stereotype, stating “most Somalis are not on welfare,” reflecting broader evidence that welfare dependence is not universal among Somali communities [1]. At the same time, specialized analyses (for example from advocacy-leaning think tanks) present higher program-use figures for Somali-born households in specific locales, but those are not national, uniform measures and sometimes count different programs or refundable tax credits [3].
3. Minnesota: concentration, poverty, and the fraud scandal that changed the conversation
The Twin Cities area has the largest Somali population in the U.S., and state reporting has focused on concentrated poverty and a major welfare-fraud investigation tied to Feeding Our Future and related schemes. Reporting describes hundreds of millions — and in some accounts over $1 billion — alleged to have been stolen in schemes that involved many Somali Americans, prompting federal prosecutions and political attention [7] [5] [8]. Those cases are local and criminal, not evidence that 88% of Somalis receive lawful welfare benefits [2] [8].
4. Partisan framing and competing narratives in media coverage
Conservative outlets have framed the fraud revelations as systemic and used them to make sweeping claims about Somalis and welfare [5]. Progressive and community outlets, and at least one fact-checking thread, warn that the focus on criminal actors risks stereotyping an entire community and that sensational reporting has sometimes overreached in linking fraud proceeds to terrorism or claiming community-wide culpability [8] [2]. Both perspectives use the same underlying events but draw different policy and cultural conclusions.
5. What available sources do and do not say about actual welfare rates
Available sources in this set do not provide a validated, national percentage of Somali Americans on welfare. Some site-level figures and claims about program usage or poverty exist for Minnesota and for small samples [3] [9], and advocacy materials assert most Somalis are not on welfare [1]. But the specific “88%” number is not substantiated by the sources provided and was not documented by the White House when the claim was made [2].
6. How to interpret the evidence and where further verification is needed
The responsible reading of current reporting separates three things: lawful participation in safety-net programs (which national surveys can estimate but are sparse by small ancestry group), localized criminal fraud cases (documented by prosecutions in Minnesota), and political rhetoric that amplifies anecdote into a national statistic [2] [7]. To verify a true percentage you would need detailed, transparent tabulations from a representative dataset (ACS or program administrative records) disaggregated by country of birth or ancestry — available sources do not mention such a national tabulation for Somalis (not found in current reporting).
7. Bottom line for readers
Do not accept a single, sweeping percentage — especially “88%” — as established fact based on current reporting: the number was asserted publicly but not documented by officials or independent data in these sources [2]. Reporting does document poverty concentrations and high-profile fraud prosecutions in Minnesota that have fueled political attacks and competing narratives; those realities warrant scrutiny without allowing criminal cases to define an entire ethnic community [8] [7].