How do U.S. Census and American Community Survey definitions (country of birth vs. ancestry) change Somali population counts in Minnesota?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Counts of “Somalis in Minnesota” diverge depending on whether analysts use country-of-birth (foreign‑born) tallies or self‑reported ancestry: country‑of‑birth measures capture only people born in Somalia — roughly 41,000 in Minnesota per recent Census Bureau reporting — while ancestry measures (what the American Community Survey and related products call “Somali descent”) capture U.S.‑born children and multigenerational descendants and estimate roughly 107,000–108,000 Minnesotans of Somali ancestry [1] [2] [3].
1. Why the two measures produce different headcounts: birthplace versus ancestry
Country‑of‑birth is a straightforward demographic item that records where a person was born and therefore counts only the foreign‑born population; in Minnesota that yields a far smaller number because it excludes U.S.‑born children and descendants of Somali immigrants (the Census Bureau figure for people born in Somalia in Minnesota is about 41,000) [1]. By contrast, the American Community Survey asks about ancestry and about national origin in a way that lets people report Somali ancestry even if they were born in the United States, which is why ACS‑based ancestry estimates show roughly 107,000–108,000 residents of Somali descent in Minnesota [1] [2].
2. How citizenship and generational change magnify the gap
A large share of the Somali‑ancestry population in Minnesota is U.S.‑born or naturalized: sources report that almost 58% of Somalis in Minnesota were born in the U.S., and among the foreign‑born Somalis an overwhelming majority (about 87%) are naturalized U.S. citizens — facts that explain why country‑of‑birth counts understate the community’s civic presence and why ancestry counts are larger [3] [1]. The difference therefore reflects a demographic reality: a maturing immigrant community whose children and second‑generation members are captured by ancestry questions but not by birthplace counts [3] [2].
3. Different data products, different methods, different years — stacked uncertainty
Estimates vary by data product and year: the 2020 decennial census snapshot counted about 91,000 Somalis in Minnesota, while the ACS rolling estimates put the 2024–2025 ancestry figure near 107,000–108,000 [2]. State compilations and older ACS releases show still other numbers — for example, Minnesota’s demography pages noted roughly 58,800 people reporting Somali ancestry in 2018 — reflecting changes in sampling windows, question wording, and response rates over time [4] [2]. The ACS is a survey that extrapolates from samples and therefore carries margins of error and weighting choices; the decennial is a universal mail‑out but can miss or misclassify people too [2] [4].
4. Measurement caveats that push counts up or down
Practical issues skew the two measures in predictable ways: ancestry estimates can be diluted if respondents report broad labels like “African” or “American” instead of “Somali,” which reduces ancestry counts, while country‑of‑birth figures can obscure origin because some datasets aggregate Somalia into larger regions (e.g., “Eastern Africa”) or omit country‑level detail for small cells, making state comparisons awkward [4] [5]. Survey nonresponse tied to language and trust also likely undercounts immigrant populations in both the decennial and ACS [4].
5. Political and analytical consequences of choosing one definition over the other
Which statistic gets cited has immediate consequences: ancestry totals are used by advocates and local planners to capture service needs and cultural presence, while foreign‑born or country‑of‑birth figures are often emphasized in political debates about immigration status and enforcement — a dynamic visible in recent political targeting of Minnesota’s Somali community [3] [1]. Analysts and policymakers must therefore be explicit about whether they mean “born in Somalia” (a legal‑status and migration metric) or “of Somali ancestry” (a demographic and cultural metric) because the two answer different policy questions [3] [2].
6. Bottom line and limits of available reporting
The bottom line: ancestry measures (ACS/decennial ancestry questions) produce substantially larger Somali population estimates in Minnesota — roughly double the foreign‑born count — because they include U.S.‑born descendants, while country‑of‑birth measures count only those born in Somalia and thus undercount the community’s full size and civic footprint [1] [3]. Available reporting documents these differences, but cannot reconcile them into a single “true” number without further, targeted demographic work and access to microdata beyond the public reports cited here [4] [2].