Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Are births and fertility the main driver of Muslim population growth in the UK or is immigration responsible?
Executive Summary
The central claim is contested: the data in the analyses show both immigration and births contribute to Muslim population growth in the UK, but recent official material attributes overall UK population growth predominantly to net migration while community-specific reports highlight births and a youthful age structure among Muslims. Official Office for National Statistics-derived analysis says net migration accounted for more than all of the UK’s population increase between 2022 and 2037, indicating immigration is the primary driver of national growth [1]. Community-focused material from the Muslim Council of Britain and related census summaries emphasize a large increase in the Muslim population between 2011 and 2021 driven by a higher share of women of childbearing age, family reunion migration, students and UK births [2] [3]. These sources together imply a mixed picture: immigration drives overall population change while births and age structure drive intra-group growth [1] [2].
1. Big-picture national numbers show immigration dominating recent population change
Official population projections and summaries in the provided material state net migration accounted for 104% of UK population growth between 2022 and 2037, which by arithmetic means migration more than offset natural change patterns and was the primary contributor to national population increase [1]. That figure is presented as a broad, economy-wide demographic finding, not a group-specific breakdown, and carries the implication that any discussion of UK population rise must prioritize migration flows. The ONS-linked analysis also notes that migration alters birth totals because migrant women have distinct fertility patterns compared with the settled population, so migration and births are linked rather than independent drivers [1]. This official framing places immigration at the center of policy and public discussion of population change while acknowledging interaction effects with fertility.
2. Community-level reports show a distinct role for births, age profile and migration
The Muslim Council of Britain’s census-based summaries document that the Muslim population rose by about 1.2 million between 2011 and 2021, contributing roughly 32% of UK population growth in that decade, and they list multiple contributors: a higher share of women of childbearing age, family reunion immigration, international students and intra-EU labor movement before 2021 [2] [3]. The community reports stress that about half of Muslims in the UK are UK-born, indicating significant natural increase as well as continued immigration [2]. Those documents present a composite explanation: births matter because of age structure and higher fertility in some subgroups, while immigration raises cohort sizes and shapes future fertility potential through the age and origin composition of migrants [2].
3. Research on immigrant-generation fertility nuances the simple birth-vs-immigration question
Demographic research cited in the analyses examines fertility across immigrant generations and finds differences between women who migrated as children, UK-born women with foreign-born parents, and mixed-origin second generations, pointing to variation in fertility by generation that complicates attributing growth to births alone [4]. The ONS-material referenced notes that the statistical system does not capture parents’ religion at birth registration comprehensively, limiting direct attribution of births to parental religion categories [5]. This methodological gap means analysts must infer contributions from age structure, place of birth, and known migration patterns rather than from births explicitly tagged as “to Muslim parents,” so quantitative separation of births versus migration contributions at the religion level remains imperfect [5] [4].
4. Public perception and political framing diverge from technical nuance
Survey material in the provided analyses shows social attitudes can distort or simplify the debate: a YouGov survey found substantial negative public sentiment toward Muslim immigrants, which sometimes fuels claims that immigration alone explains Muslim population growth [6]. The sourced commentary highlights that such perceptions do not align cleanly with demographic evidence showing substantial UK-born Muslim populations and mixed drivers of growth [2] [6]. This contrast reveals an agenda risk: political or social narratives may emphasize immigration to support policy arguments while community reports emphasize births and age structure to underline long-term social integration and services needs [3] [6].
5. Conclusion: mixed causation and necessary caveats for interpretation
Taken together, the available analyses show immigration is the primary driver of recent overall UK population growth, while births and a youthful age structure significantly fuel growth within the Muslim population. Official ONS-derived claims situate migration at the center of population change [1]. Community-level studies and census summaries show substantial natural increase and a high proportion of UK-born Muslims, indicating births and cohort composition matter importantly for the group’s expansion [2]. Methodological constraints—chiefly the absence of religion-tagged birth registrations and generational fertility variation—mean any precise percentage split between immigration and births for Muslim population growth is not directly available in the cited material; analysts must therefore combine migration flows, age profiles and generational fertility patterns to estimate contributions [5] [4].